The True First Settlers: Mesolithic Ireland – Arrival & Early Adaptation (c. 8000 – 6700 BC)

1. Introduction: The Dawn of Continuous Habitation in Post-Glacial Ireland (c. 8000 BC)

The commencement of the Mesolithic period in Ireland, around 8000 BC, heralds a pivotal chapter in the island’s human story: the arrival of its first continuous settlers. This era, spanning roughly from 8000 BC to 4000 BC, marks a departure from the ephemeral, sporadic human presence suggested by earlier, isolated Palaeolithic finds.¹ The Earlier Mesolithic, the focus of this report, covers the period from approximately 8000 BC to 6700 BC and is distinguished primarily by a characteristic microlithic stone tool technology.¹ These millennia represent the pioneering phase of human interaction with the Irish landscape, a period of profound adaptation and innovation that laid the critical groundwork for all subsequent cultural developments on the island.²

The Environmental Canvas: Ireland at the Cusp of the Holocene

The backdrop to this human drama was an Ireland undergoing immense environmental transformation. The Pleistocene epoch, a vast expanse of geological time characterized by cyclical Ice Ages and warmer interglacial periods, had drawn to a close, c. 11,700 years ago, ushering in the Holocene epoch.⁴ This new epoch was defined by a significant warming trend, and by approximately 8000 BC, the last vestiges of the great ice sheets that had periodically scoured the Irish landscape had vanished.⁵ Temperatures across Northwest Europe, including Ireland, rose rapidly after c. 9700 BC.³ This climatic amelioration initiated the development of new ecosystems, with wooded landscapes gradually replacing the stark, arctic tundra that had characterized the immediate post-glacial environment.³

The initial conditions faced by the first settlers were far from benign. The landscape was still raw, bearing the fresh imprint of glaciation, and the ecosystems were in their infancy, moving from pioneering tundra vegetation towards more established woodlands.⁵ The very act of successfully colonising and establishing a continuous presence in Ireland around 8000 BC, therefore, speaks volumes about the remarkable adaptability and resilience of these early human groups. They were not stepping into a stable, resource-abundant paradise, but rather navigating and mastering an environment in considerable flux, one that was still actively evolving from its glacial past into the temperate landscapes of the later Holocene.

Defining the Earlier Mesolithic: Significance and Chronology

The Irish Mesolithic is traditionally bifurcated into an Earlier phase (c. 8000 – 6700 BC) and a Later phase (c. 6700 – 4000 BC), a division primarily based on distinct changes observed in stone tool technology.¹ The Earlier Mesolithic is specifically defined by its reliance on a microlithic toolkit, where small, finely made flint blades (microliths) were the principal components of composite tools.¹ This technological distinction is not merely a typological footnote; it carries significant implications. The shift from this microlithic tradition to the macrolithic (large stone tool) industries of the Later Mesolithic around 6700 BC likely signals more fundamental transformations. Such changes in material culture often reflect broader adjustments in subsistence strategies, mobility patterns, or even social organisation, potentially driven by ongoing environmental maturation, the availability of different resources, or internal cultural evolution within these early societies.¹ The relatively short span of approximately 1300 years for this Earlier Mesolithic phase thus encapsulates a critical period of initial settlement, exploration, and the establishment of a uniquely Irish way of life.

2. Voyage to an Island: The Arrival of Ireland’s First Settlers

The peopling of Ireland during the Earlier Mesolithic was fundamentally a maritime endeavour. The geological and palaeoenvironmental records indicate that Ireland had attained its insular status by approximately 14,000 BC, long before the sustained human colonisation that commenced around 8000 BC.¹ Any land bridges that might have intermittently connected Ireland to Britain during earlier glacial phases had long since been submerged by rising sea levels.¹ While theories of slowly shifting land bridges extending from areas like Brittany have been proposed for earlier post-glacial plant and animal colonisation ⁹, geologists largely agree that during the most recent glacial phase and its immediate aftermath, Ireland remained an island.⁴ Consequently, the arrival of the first Mesolithic settlers necessitated deliberate sea voyages.¹

Maritime Colonisation: Evidence and Implications of Sea Travel

The journey across the waters separating Britain from Ireland, even at the narrowest points, would have been a significant undertaking, demanding capable watercraft and a considerable degree of seamanship. While no actual Mesolithic boats from the Earlier period have been preserved in Ireland, inferences can be drawn from contemporary European evidence and later Irish archaeological finds. Logboats (dugout canoes) or vessels constructed from animal skins stretched over wooden frames are the most likely candidates.³ A later Mesolithic logboat from Lough Neagh, dated to c. 5300 BC, attests to the presence of such technology on the island, albeit from a later phase.¹³ The presence of Mesolithic material on islands that would have been difficult to access without watercraft, such as Inishtrahull off the coast of Donegal, further underscores their maritime capabilities.³

These maritime skills were not only crucial for the initial colonisation event(s) but also formed an integral part of their subsequent adaptation, facilitating movement along coastlines and extensive river systems for resource exploitation and communication.² The ability to undertake such voyages implies that the colonising groups possessed a pre-existing maritime tradition. This was not an accidental drift of a few individuals but likely a more deliberate, albeit perilous, expansion by people already equipped with the knowledge of boat construction and navigation. The successful establishment of viable, continuous settlements suggests either multiple successful crossings or founding groups of sufficient size to maintain a population, pointing to a level of maritime technological competence and exploratory behaviour that was developed prior to their arrival in Ireland.

Tracing Origins: Connections to Britain and Continental Europe

The most probable proximate origin point for Ireland’s first Mesolithic settlers is Britain.¹ Archaeological and genetic evidence points towards connections with various regions, including Scotland, Wales, and Southwest England.² This suggests that the “arrival” was not a monolithic event from a single source but potentially a more complex process involving multiple small groups migrating from different parts of Britain over an extended period. Such a scenario would contribute to the genetic and cultural mosaic of the initial Irish population.

Genetic analysis of Mesolithic human remains from Ireland has revealed close affinities with contemporary hunter-gatherer populations from Britain (such as the individual known as “Cheddar Man”) and also with groups from Northwest mainland Europe.¹⁵ This shared ancestry underscores a common European Mesolithic heritage. Archaeologically, these connections are supported by similarities in early Mesolithic material culture. For instance, the types of microlithic tools and the nature of dwelling structures, such as the hut remnants found at Mount Sandel in Co. Derry, show parallels with contemporary sites in northern Britain.¹

The Insular Context: Ireland’s Post-Glacial Geography

The established insularity of Ireland by c. 14,000 BC, approximately 6,000 years before the main Mesolithic settlement phase ¹, is a critical factor in understanding its early human history. This isolation had profound consequences, limiting the natural colonisation of many plant and animal species that were common in Britain and continental Europe.³ Thus, the first settlers arrived in an environment already biotically distinct from their potential homelands, necessitating immediate adaptation to a comparatively “impoverished” native flora and fauna. This unique ecological context set the stage for a distinctively Irish Mesolithic adaptation from the outset.

Furthermore, the Irish coastline was not static during the Earlier Mesolithic. Global sea levels continued to rise as remnant ice sheets melted, and the land itself was experiencing isostatic rebound (uplift after the removal of the immense weight of ice).³ This complex interplay meant that shorelines were actively changing. Many coastal areas occupied by the earliest settlers are now submerged, particularly in the southwest of Ireland where former coastlines may lie 30-45 metres below current sea level, and to a lesser extent in the northeast (2-13 metres underwater).³ This submergence has inevitably led to the loss of a significant portion of the earliest coastal archaeological record, complicating our understanding of initial settlement patterns and adaptations.¹⁸ The first settlers were, in essence, adapting to a coastline that was itself in a state of transformation.

3. Adapting to a New World: The Irish Environment (c. 8000 – 6700 BC)

The environment encountered by Ireland’s first continuous settlers around 8000 BC was a dynamic and evolving landscape, profoundly shaped by the retreat of the Pleistocene ice sheets and the rapid climatic warming that characterized the beginning of the Holocene epoch.² Understanding this environmental context is crucial for interpreting their adaptive strategies.

Environmental Aspect	Brief Description (c. 8000 BC)
Climate	Rapidly warming; Holocene thermal maximum approaching. By 8400 BC, mid-winter temperatures estimated at 0-4°C, high-summer 14-18°C (similar to or warmer than present).19 Generally temperate.4
Dominant Vegetation	Transition from arctic tundra to pioneering woodlands. Initially birch and willow, then pine, followed by a rapid expansion of hazel becoming dominant in many areas by 8000 BC. Oak and elm spreading more slowly. Dense woodland cover in many regions.1
Key Animal Species (for exploitation)	Mammals: Wild boar (primary large game), hare, fox, badger, wild cat, brown bear, wolf. Notably, red deer were absent.3 Birds: Duck, pigeon, grouse, goshawk, seabirds. Fish: Salmon, trout, eel, sea bass, flounder.3
Sea Level Status (relative to present)	Rising. Earlier Mesolithic shorelines now largely submerged: 30-45m below current sea level in the southwest, 2-13m in the northeast.3 Ireland fully an island.1

Table 1: Overview of the Post-Glacial Environment in Ireland (c. 8000 BC)

Climatic Conditions and Landscape Evolution

The transition to the Holocene brought a dramatic shift in climate. After approximately 9700 BC, temperatures rose swiftly, marking the end of the severe cold of the Younger Dryas stadial and initiating a period of relative warmth.³ By 8400 BC, estimates suggest mid-winter temperatures of 0 to 4°C and high-summer temperatures of 14 to 18°C, conditions comparable to, or even warmer than, those experienced in Ireland today.¹⁹ This warming trend was a primary driver of environmental change.

The landscape itself was a direct legacy of the preceding glaciations. Features such as drumlins (elongated, rounded mounds), eskers (winding ridges of sand and gravel), cirques (bowl-shaped hollows in mountains), and moraines (accumulations of glacial debris) dominated the topography.⁴ These glacial landforms influenced drainage patterns, soil development, and the distribution of superficial deposits like sand and gravel, which would later be exploited for tool making or construction. The retreat of the ice also carved out the major river valleys, such as those of the Bann and the Shannon, which quickly became vital arteries for movement, communication, and access to resources for the incoming Mesolithic populations.² This geologically young and dynamic terrain, still visibly bearing the fresh scars of the Ice Age, would have presented both challenges and opportunities for the first settlers, influencing their choice of settlement locations and their routes of travel across the island.

Pioneering Flora: The Spread of Woodlands

As temperatures rose, vegetation colonised the newly exposed land. The initial sparse arctic tundra, characterized by grasses, sedges, and dwarf shrubs, gradually gave way to more complex plant communities.³ Pioneer tree species, such as birch and willow, were among the first to establish light woodlands.³ These were followed by pine, and then, significantly, by hazel, which underwent a rapid and widespread expansion around 10,000 BP (c. 8000 BC), quickly coming to dominate the woodland canopy in many parts of Ireland, particularly the northern half.³ Oak and elm, requiring more stable conditions, spread more slowly and became more significant components of the forest later in the Mesolithic.³

By the time of the main Mesolithic settlement, much of Ireland was becoming densely wooded.¹ This burgeoning forest environment would have profoundly influenced the lives of the first settlers. The rapid spread of hazel, for example, would have created a relatively “closed” canopy in many areas. This type of environment might have channeled human movement along coastlines and river corridors, which remained more open, and would have made traditional open-country hunting strategies, common in other European Mesolithic contexts, less viable. Conversely, it provided new resources, most notably an abundance of hazelnuts, which became a dietary staple, and created suitable habitats for woodland-adapted fauna like wild boar.

Available Fauna: Sustaining the First Inhabitants

The faunal assemblage available to Ireland’s first settlers was notably different from that of contemporary Britain, primarily due to Ireland’s earlier and more complete isolation by rising sea levels.³ This resulted in a relatively impoverished native terrestrial mammal fauna. Crucially, large herbivores such as red deer (Cervus elaphus), roe deer, aurochs (wild cattle), and elk, which were significant game animals for Mesolithic populations across Britain and continental Europe, were absent from Mesolithic Ireland.² Faunal records from key Mesolithic sites like Mount Sandel, combined with extensive palaeontological research and dating programs, consistently show no evidence for red deer until their probable introduction during the Neolithic period, thousands of years later.²¹

This absence of large ungulates had a fundamental impact on the subsistence strategies of Irish Mesolithic people. Instead of focusing on herd animals, they adapted to hunt the available terrestrial mammals, with wild boar being the most significant large game species.³ Other mammals present included hare, fox, badger, wild cat, and the now-extinct Irish brown bear and wolf.³ Birds were also an important resource, with a diverse range of species exploited, including wildfowl (ducks, geese), pigeons, grouse, and seabirds along the coasts.³

The waters, both freshwater and marine, teemed with life and provided a critical and reliable food source. Rivers and lakes offered abundant salmon, trout, eels, Arctic char, lamprey, and pollan.³ Coastal waters yielded sea bass, flounder, and other marine fish.³ Shellfish, such as oysters, mussels, limpets, and periwinkles, were also extensively gathered from coastal and estuarine environments, as evidenced by shell middens at later Mesolithic sites.³

The only domesticated animal present during the Earlier Mesolithic was the dog, which was almost certainly brought to Ireland by the settlers and would have aided in hunting.³ The unique faunal spectrum, particularly the lack of red deer, forced a significant and immediate divergence in Irish Mesolithic hunting practices and overall economic strategies compared to their British contemporaries. This necessitated a greater reliance on wild boar, the rich avian and aquatic resources, and gathered plant foods.

Coastal Transformations: The Impact of Changing Sea Levels

The coastline encountered by the first settlers was not a fixed entity. Throughout the Earlier Mesolithic, relative sea levels were in a state of flux, driven by the combined effects of eustatic sea-level rise (due to melting global ice sheets) and glacio-isostatic adjustment (the rebound of the landmass after being depressed by ice).³ In Ireland, this resulted in a complex pattern of coastal change. Generally, sea levels rose, inundating former land areas.

This process had a profound impact on the archaeological record. Many of the earliest coastal settlements and activity areas are now submerged, particularly in the southwest of Ireland where former shorelines from this period may lie 30 to 45 metres below the current sea level.³ In the northeast, which experienced greater isostatic uplift, the submergence was less severe, with Early Mesolithic shores typically found 2 to 13 metres underwater.³ This loss of coastal sites means that our understanding of the very earliest phases of settlement and maritime adaptation is inherently incomplete.¹⁸ The settlers were adapting to a dynamic coastal environment, where the location of the shoreline, estuaries, and resource zones could shift within human lifetimes or over a few generations. This would have demanded flexibility in settlement choices and resource exploitation strategies.

4. Life on the Edge: The Hunter-Gatherer-Fisher Way of Life

The Earlier Mesolithic inhabitants of Ireland were skilled hunter-gatherer-fishers who developed a lifestyle intricately adapted to the island’s unique post-glacial environment. Their existence was characterized by mobility, a deep understanding of seasonal resources, and a settlement pattern closely tied to aquatic environments.

Settlement Patterns: Coastal and Riverine Niches, “Persistent Places”

Archaeological evidence consistently shows that Earlier Mesolithic settlements were predominantly located near water sources: the sea coast, estuaries, rivers, and lakes.¹ These locations offered a confluence of advantages, including access to diverse food resources (fish, fowl, mammals, shellfish, edible plants) and convenient routes for transportation and communication via watercraft. Initially, it appears that the dense, newly established inland forests were less frequented, with a preference for the more open and resource-rich littoral and riparian zones.¹⁴

The settlement strategy was not one of random wandering. Instead, it involved the concept of “persistent places” – favoured locations that were revisited seasonally or over many generations.¹ These repeated occupations, even if temporary in nature for each visit, led to the accumulation of cultural deposits, including tools, food waste, and hearth remains, creating a discernible archaeological signature. This pattern suggests a more complex and structured relationship with the landscape than simple nomadism, implying a degree of territorial awareness and a cultural memory associated with these significant locations.

Two main types of occupation sites are recognized:

• Base Camps: These were likely more substantial sites, possibly occupied for longer durations within a season or returned to regularly over many years. The premier example from the Earlier Mesolithic is Mount Sandel, Co. Derry.¹²
• Temporary Encampments: These were smaller, more ephemeral sites, likely used for specific, short-term resource exploitation activities. While Lough Boora, Co. Offaly, is primarily dated to the Later Mesolithic or the transition, it exemplifies this type of specialized camp focused on lakeside resources.¹

Evidence for dwellings is most clearly represented at Mount Sandel. Excavations there revealed the remains of circular or oval hut-like structures, approximately 6 metres in diameter.¹⁰ These were defined by patterns of post-holes, many inclined inwards, suggesting a framework of bent saplings, likely covered with perishable organic materials such as animal hides, reeds, or turf.²⁰ Centrally located hearths provided warmth, light, and a focus for domestic activities.²⁰ These structures are, to date, the only confirmed Mesolithic houses found in Ireland and are thought to have sheltered small, extended family groups.²⁰

Subsistence Strategies: Diversified Foraging in a Unique Insular Ecology

The subsistence economy of Earlier Mesolithic Ireland was a broad-spectrum adaptation, finely tuned to the specific flora and fauna of the post-glacial island.³ As previously noted, the absence of large herbivores like red deer necessitated a different approach compared to many contemporary British and European Mesolithic cultures.

Hunting focused on wild boar as the primary large terrestrial game, likely pursued in the expanding woodlands, particularly along river valleys.¹⁰ Smaller mammals such as hare, fox, and badger, along with various bird species (ducks, pigeons, grouse), also contributed to the diet.³

Fishing played a demonstrably crucial role. Rivers, lakes, and coastal waters provided abundant and seasonally predictable resources, including salmon, eel, trout, sea bass, and flounder.⁹ While direct evidence for fishing technology from the Earlier Mesolithic is sparse, later Mesolithic finds, such as intricately woven fish traps (e.g., the 7,000-year-old example from Clowanstown, Co. Meath), imply a long-standing tradition of sophisticated fishing techniques, likely including spears, lines, and nets.¹

Gathering plant foods was equally important. Hazelnuts are a ubiquitous find on Mesolithic sites, often preserved through carbonisation, indicating their significance as a storable, high-energy food source.³ Other fruits (like apple/pear), berries (crowberry, blackberry), seeds (water lily), and edible roots and greens were also exploited seasonally.³ Along the coasts, shellfish such as oysters, limpets, periwinkles, and mussels were collected, with their discarded shells forming middens at some locations.³ This diversified diet, with a strong emphasis on aquatic and plant resources alongside boar hunting, is a defining characteristic of the Irish Mesolithic adaptation, a direct consequence of the island’s unique faunal makeup.

Mobility and Seasonality: Rhythms of an Ancient Lifestyle

The Earlier Mesolithic lifestyle was inherently mobile, with groups likely moving across the landscape in a structured seasonal round to exploit resources as they became available.¹ This was not aimless wandering but a patterned movement reflecting an intimate knowledge of the environment and its rhythms.

Examples of seasonal exploitation are evident from sites like Mount Sandel, where faunal and floral remains suggest the catching of migrating salmon during the summer, the gathering of hazelnuts in the autumn, and the hunting of wild boar in the winter.¹⁰ Rivers and lakes served as natural highways, facilitating travel and communication between different resource zones.² This seasonal rhythm would have structured not only their subsistence activities but also their social calendar, potentially influencing times of group aggregation (perhaps at abundant seasonal resources like salmon runs) and dispersal, as well as opportunities for information exchange, social interaction, and ritual activities.

Social Dynamics: Inferences from the Archaeological Record

Direct evidence for the social structure of Earlier Mesolithic communities is inherently limited, but inferences can be drawn from settlement patterns, burial practices, and the nature of their material culture. It is widely assumed that they lived in small, mobile groups, likely based on extended family units.¹⁸ Such hunter-gatherer societies are often characterized by a broadly egalitarian social organisation, although nuances and temporary leadership roles may have existed.¹⁸

A crucial element of their social fabric would have been the shared knowledge of the landscape, its resources, appropriate technologies for exploitation, and the traditions passed down through generations.²⁵ The survival and success of these pioneering groups depended on this collective wisdom.

Early burial evidence, though rare, provides profound glimpses into their social and ritual lives. The cremation burial at Hermitage, Co. Limerick, dated to c. 7530-7320 cal BC, is particularly illuminating.¹² The careful treatment of the deceased, the inclusion of significant grave goods like the highly polished and ritually “killed” adze, and the possible erection of a grave marker suggest developing ritual practices, a sense of place and belonging, and a complex symbolic worldview. While an egalitarian ethos may have prevailed, the investment of labour and care in such mortuary practices hints at the recognition of individual status or specific social roles, and a shared understanding of life, death, and the afterlife that went far beyond mere subsistence.

5. The Toolkit of Survival: Earlier Mesolithic Microlithic Technology

The material culture of Ireland’s first settlers is dominated by their stone tool technology, a sophisticated system adapted to the resources and challenges of the post-glacial environment. The Earlier Mesolithic period (c. 8000 – 6700 BC) is specifically defined by its characteristic microlithic industry.¹

Table 2: Characteristics of Earlier Mesolithic Lithic Technology in Ireland

Tool Category	Dominant Raw Material(s)	Key Manufacturing Traits	Presumed Functional Applications
Microliths
– Scalene Triangles	High-quality Flint	Small (<5cm) snapped blades, geometric shaping, abrupt blunting. Direct percussion (soft hammer),?microburin technique.	Components of composite tools: barbs/tips for arrows, spears, harpoons; cutting elements in knives.1
– Needle Points (surface-retouched)	High-quality Flint	As above, with fine surface retouch to create a point. Particular Irish form.8	Piercing, awl-like functions, projectile tips.8
– Rods	High-quality Flint	As above, elongated narrow forms.8	Barbs or inserts in composite tools.28
– Backed Blades	High-quality Flint	One edge blunted by abrupt retouch.8	Cutting elements in knives, projectile components.8
Flake Axes/Adzes	Flint, other local stones	Made on large flakes, often with an adze-like asymmetrical blade.8	Woodworking: chopping, planing, chiseling.28
Core Axes	Flint, other local stones	Bifacially worked from a core, rounded symmetrical edges, often re-sharpened.28	Woodworking: chopping.28
Polished Stone Axes/Adzes	Shale, Mudstone, Flint etc.	Ground and polished cutting edge, sometimes entire surface. Laborious process.1	Woodworking, digging (possibly), ritual/symbolic importance.1
Scrapers	Flint, Chert	Retouched flakes, often with convex working edge.8	Hide processing, woodworking.28
Picks, Awls, Borers	Flint, Chert	Varied forms, often pointed flakes or blades.20	Piercing, boring holes in various materials (wood, bone, hide).32

The Irish Microlithic Tradition: Characteristic Forms

The hallmark of the Earlier Irish Mesolithic is its microlithic technology.¹ Microliths are diminutive stone artefacts, typically fashioned from small flint blades often less than 5 cm in length, and frequently only 2-3 cm.¹ These blades were intentionally snapped and then further modified by retouch (the removal of small flakes) to create distinctive geometric shapes or to blunt one or more edges.

While various microlithic forms are found across Mesolithic Europe, the Irish Earlier Mesolithic assemblages exhibit a particular emphasis on specific types. Notably, scalene triangles, rods (narrow, elongated forms), and distinctive surface-retouched needle points are considered highly characteristic.⁸ Backed blades, where one lateral edge is steeply retouched to create a blunt back, are also a component of these assemblages.⁸ It is important to understand that these microliths were not typically used as standalone tools; rather, they were designed as interchangeable components – armatures or barbs – to be hafted into organic (bone or wooden) handles or shafts, thereby creating composite tools.¹ The specific typology observed in Ireland, with its emphasis on forms like needle points (some of which are described as local or particular to Ireland ⁸), may reflect functional adaptations tailored to the Irish environment – for instance, targeting specific prey animals or processing particular plant materials. Alternatively, these typological nuances could represent regional cultural preferences inherited from the founding populations or developed in relative isolation.

Raw Material Procurement: The Importance of Flint and Chert

The preferred raw material for this sophisticated microlithic technology was high-quality flint.¹ Flint’s conchoidal fracture properties allow for the predictable production of sharp, durable edges. Access to reliable sources of good quality flint would therefore have been a significant factor influencing the mobility patterns and settlement choices of Earlier Mesolithic groups.¹

In Ireland, the primary sources of flint are concentrated in the northeast, particularly in County Antrim, where Cretaceous chalk deposits containing flint nodules outcrop or are found as beach pebbles.¹⁴ ‘The Curran’ gravels at Larne, Co. Antrim, represent a well-known and extensive accumulation of flint raw material that was exploited during the Mesolithic.² The geological reality, however, is that flint-bearing chalk is often overlain by several hundred feet of basalt, meaning easily accessible sources were not ubiquitous even in the northeast.³⁹

In regions where flint was scarce, Mesolithic people demonstrated adaptability by utilizing other knappable stones. Chert, a cryptocrystalline quartz similar to flint, was a common alternative and is found in Carboniferous limestone areas.³⁹ For example, the lithic assemblage from the inland site of Lough Boora, Co. Offaly, is dominated by chert, whereas the assemblage from Mount Sandel, closer to the Antrim flint sources, is predominantly flint with some chert.¹⁰ This variation in raw material use across different sites likely reflects factors such as the proximity of sources, the extent of group mobility, and potentially exchange networks. Beyond flint and chert, other materials like siltstone, mudstone, greywacke, quartz, slate, various volcanic tuffs, and rhyolite were also employed, particularly in the west of Ireland where flint is virtually absent, showcasing a pragmatic approach to resource availability.⁴² The geographical constraint of flint sources likely acted as a “pull factor,” influencing settlement and procurement strategies, while the resourceful use of alternatives in flint-poor regions highlights the ingenuity of these early populations.

Manufacturing Processes: Crafting Composite Tools

The production of microlithic tools involved a multi-stage manufacturing process (chaîne opératoire) requiring considerable skill and planning. The initial step was the production of suitable blades – relatively thin, parallel-sided flakes. For the small, regular blades destined to become microliths, a technique of direct percussion using a soft hammer (made of antler, bone, or wood) is now considered likely, allowing for greater control in detaching delicate blades from a carefully prepared core.³² For larger blades or flakes, a hard hammer (stone) direct percussion technique may have been used.³² Some sources also suggest the use of indirect percussion (where a punch is struck by a hammerstone) for fine blade production.²⁸

Once suitable blades were obtained, they were segmented and shaped into the desired microlithic forms. This often involved the microburin technique, a specialized method for snapping blades obliquely by creating a small notch and then applying pressure or a light blow.³¹ The microburin itself is a characteristic piece of waste (a small, triangular fragment with a distinctive fracture facet) resulting from this process, and its presence at a site is a strong indicator of microlith manufacture. The edges of the microlith were then often further modified by abrupt retouch (steep blunting) to shape them or to create a strong back for hafting.³¹

The final stage was hafting. The finished microliths were set into slots or grooves carved into handles or shafts made of wood or bone. Adhesives, such as pine resin or birch bark tar, would have been used to secure them in place.¹ This creation of composite tools, where multiple small stone elements were combined with organic components, represents a sophisticated technological solution. It allowed for the efficient use of high-quality raw material (as small pieces could be utilized), easy replacement of damaged or worn barbs or cutting edges, and the creation of versatile and effective implements.

Functional Adaptations: Tools for Hunting, Fishing, and Daily Tasks

The Earlier Mesolithic toolkit was versatile, designed to exploit the range of resources available in the Irish environment. The microlithic components were primarily used to create hunting and fishing gear. Hafted as barbs or tips, they would have formed parts of arrows, spears, or harpoons, essential for procuring game such as wild boar and birds, and for fishing in rivers, lakes, and estuaries.¹ For example, butt-trimmed flakes found at Mount Sandel may have been hafted onto wooden shafts for spearing fish.¹⁰ Microliths could also be set in series along a handle to create saw-like or knife-like cutting tools.

Larger tools also played important roles. Flake axes and adzes, often made from flint or other local stones, were used for woodworking tasks such as felling small trees, shaping timber for shelters or boat construction, and crafting tool handles.⁸ Core axes, bifacially worked, served similar chopping functions.²⁸ Scrapers, typically made on flakes with a retouched working edge, were essential for processing animal hides for clothing, shelter coverings, or other uses.⁸ Other tools like picks, awls, and borers, often made on pointed flakes or blades, would have been used for a variety of piercing and boring tasks in materials like wood, bone, antler, or hide.²⁰ The overall toolkit reflects a practical and efficient adaptation to the demands of a hunter-gatherer-fisher lifestyle in a predominantly wooded and water-rich insular landscape.

The Enigma of Early Polished Stone Axes and Adzes

A particularly intriguing aspect of the Earlier Irish Mesolithic toolkit is the presence of polished stone axes and adzes.¹ While grinding and polishing of stone tools became a hallmark of the subsequent Neolithic period, evidence indicates that this technology was already being employed in Mesolithic Ireland, potentially earlier or more commonly than in some contemporary British Mesolithic traditions.⁸ Ground-edged axes have been found at early sites like Mount Sandel and Lough Boora.²⁸

The most striking example is the completely polished shale adze recovered from the early cremation burial at Hermitage, Co. Limerick, dated to c. 7530-7320 cal BC.¹² This artefact is considered by some to be the earliest securely dated polished adze or axe from an archaeological context in Europe.²⁹ The manufacture of such tools was a laborious process, involving careful shaping by flaking and pecking, followed by painstaking grinding and polishing of the cutting edge, and sometimes the entire surface, using abrasive stones and water.³³

The primary function of these polished axes and adzes was undoubtedly woodworking, enabling more efficient felling of trees and shaping of timber than was possible with solely flaked tools.¹ However, the context of the Hermitage adze, deliberately interred with human remains after being ritually “killed” by blunting its cutting edge, clearly indicates a profound symbolic and ritual significance extending beyond mere utility.²⁹ Some polished axes may also have been used as digging implements, perhaps for accessing tubers or other underground plant resources.³² The early appearance and sophisticated manufacture of these polished stone tools in Ireland suggest advanced woodworking capabilities from the initial stages of settlement and hint at a distinct cultural trajectory concerning the production, use, and societal value attributed to these highly curated items.

6. Landmarks of the Deep Past: Key Earlier Mesolithic Archaeological Sites

Our understanding of Ireland’s first settlers is built upon the careful excavation and analysis of a relatively small number of key archaeological sites. These locations, though often yielding only subtle traces of human activity, provide invaluable windows into the lives, technologies, and adaptations of Earlier Mesolithic communities.

Table 3: Key Earlier Mesolithic Sites in Ireland (c. 8000-6700 BC)

Site Name	County	Key Dates (cal BC)	Salient Features/Finds	Primary Significance
Mount Sandel	Derry	c. 7000 (or earlier within 8000-6700 BC range) 1	Circular hut structures (c. 6m diameter), central hearths, microliths (scalene triangles, rods, needle points), polished stone axes, faunal (wild pig, fish, birds) & floral (hazelnuts, apple) remains.	Premier Early Mesolithic habitation site in Ireland; provides evidence for dwellings, diet, seasonal occupation, and diverse toolkit.20
Lough Boora	Offaly	c. 6800-6500 (Late end of/transitional from Earlier Mesolithic) 1	Temporary encampment, hearths, chert-dominated lithics (axes, blades, scrapers), faunal (pig, hare, birds, fish) & floral (hazelnuts) remains, bones of symbolic birds (owl, falcon, jay).	Demonstrates inland/midland Mesolithic resource exploitation; challenges purely coastal settlement models; insights into diet and possible ritual.1
Hermitage	Limerick	7530-7320 (Pit A) 18	Cremation burials (adult in Pit A), post-hole (grave marker?), polished shale adze (ritually blunted), flint microlith & microblade.	Earliest known human burial in Ireland; evidence for complex mortuary rituals, symbolic behaviour, and advanced craftsmanship (adze).29
‘The Curran’	Antrim	Mesolithic (Earlier Mesolithic component debated/less clear) 2	Raised beach with thousands of flint tools; flint-rich location.	Major flint source and tool production/activity area; highlights importance of coastal raw material procurement.2
Ballmaglaff	Down	Mesolithic (Earlier Mesolithic component needs specific dating) 18	Extensive scatter of thousands of pieces of struck flint.	Indicates area of repeated or intensive Mesolithic activity, likely tool manufacture and use.18

Mount Sandel, Co. Derry: A Premier Early Habitation Site

Located on a high bluff overlooking the River Bann, Mount Sandel stands as one of the most significant Mesolithic sites in Ireland, and indeed Europe.²⁰ Excavated by Professor Peter Woodman in the 1970s, carbon dating primarily indicates an age of around 9,000 years old (c. 7000 BC), though some interpretations suggest occupation may have begun shortly after 8000 BC, placing it firmly within the Earlier Mesolithic period.¹

The site yielded the first definitive evidence for Mesolithic dwellings in Ireland.²⁰ The remains of multiple circular or oval hut structures, typically around 6 metres in width, were uncovered.¹⁰ These were identified by patterns of stout post-holes, many of which inclined towards the centre of the structure, suggesting a conical or dome-shaped framework of saplings. This framework was likely covered with organic materials such as animal hides, reeds, or turf, creating robust shelters.²⁰ Each hut typically contained a centrally positioned hearth.²⁰ It is thought that Mount Sandel was home to a small, extended family group, possibly occupying the site for significant portions of the year, or returning to it regularly over an extended period.²⁰

The faunal and floral remains from Mount Sandel provide a rich picture of their subsistence strategies. Evidence points to the hunting of wild pig; extensive fishing for migratory salmon, eel, sea bass, and flounder; the gathering of hazelnuts, apple seeds, and water lily; and the consumption of various birds, including duck, pigeon, and grouse.²⁰ The tool assemblage is equally informative, comprising thousands of tiny flint microliths – predominantly scalene triangles, rods, and needle points – alongside flint picks, core axes, flake axes, and, significantly, two polished stone axe heads.⁸ Due to the comprehensive nature of its assemblage – encompassing structures, dietary evidence, and a wide array of tools – Mount Sandel offers an unparalleled, holistic reconstruction of life in one specific location. It provides a tangible glimpse into the daily realities, seasonal rhythms, and technological capabilities of an Earlier Mesolithic community, serving as a crucial baseline for understanding this pioneering period.

Lough Boora, Co. Offaly: Evidence for Inland Exploitation

The discovery of Mesolithic activity at Lough Boora in County Offaly was a landmark event in Irish archaeology, as it provided clear evidence for the exploitation of inland, midland environments, challenging earlier assumptions that Mesolithic settlement was exclusively coastal or riverine.¹ While the primary occupation at Lough Boora is dated to c. 6800-6500 BC ²⁵, placing it at the very end of, or transitional from, the Earlier Mesolithic period as defined (ending c. 6700 BC), it is often cited as one of the earliest known Mesolithic settlements in the Irish midlands.²⁶ Some early examples of ground-edged axes, a feature of the Earlier Mesolithic, have also been noted from the site.³³

Lough Boora was a temporary encampment situated on the shores of a large post-glacial lake.¹ Excavations did not reveal hut structures comparable to Mount Sandel, but numerous hearths and scatters of artefacts indicated focused activity areas.²⁶ The subsistence evidence points to the hunting of pig and hare, the trapping of birds, fishing for eels and trout, and the extensive gathering of hazelnuts.¹ Intriguingly, the faunal assemblage also included bones of birds of prey such as owls and falcons, as well as jays. These are unlikely to have been primary food sources, and their presence suggests possible symbolic or ritualistic consumption, or the use of their feathers for adornment or fletching.¹ The lithic toolkit from Lough Boora is predominantly made from local chert, with some flint, and includes stone axeheads, blades, and scrapers.¹ If any component of the Lough Boora occupation can be definitively pushed further back into the pre-6700 BC timeframe, it would significantly enhance our understanding of the rapidity and extent of Early Mesolithic landscape use, demonstrating an early penetration into, and adaptation to, interior wetland ecosystems.

Hermitage, Co. Limerick: Illuminating Early Ritual and Burial Practices

The site of Hermitage, located on the banks of the River Shannon in County Limerick, has yielded the earliest known human burial in Ireland, providing profound insights into the ritual and symbolic lives of the first settlers.¹² The most significant burial, designated Pit A, has been securely radiocarbon dated to 7530-7320 cal BC, placing it squarely within the Earlier Mesolithic period.²⁹

This burial consisted of the cremated remains of an adult, which were found scattered in a crescent shape within a sub-circular pit (60 cm in diameter, 30 cm deep).²⁹ At the centre of this arrangement was a post-hole, interpreted as evidence for a wooden post that may have served as a grave marker, suggesting a desire to memorialise the deceased and the location.²⁹ Associated with the cremated remains were a flint microlith and a microblade.²⁹

The most remarkable grave good was a large, completely polished shale adze.¹⁸ This adze, considered by the excavators to be potentially the earliest securely dated polished axe or adze in Europe, was found placed carefully against the presumed post, with its cutting edge facing downwards into the pit.²⁹ Microscopic use-wear analysis revealed that the adze was likely commissioned specifically for the burial, had a short duration of use consistent with funerary rites (perhaps in preparing the pyre or grave marker), and, most significantly, was intentionally blunted before its final deposition.²⁹ This act of “killing” the adze is interpreted as a powerful symbolic gesture, mirroring the death of the individual it accompanied and effectively ending its own use-life. The Hermitage site demonstrates that from a very early stage of settlement, these pioneer communities possessed complex belief systems and engaged in elaborate mortuary practices that involved significant investment in craftsmanship, grave goods, and ritual actions.

Other Significant Discoveries

Several other locations offer glimpses into Earlier Mesolithic activity, primarily through lithic scatters that indicate tool production and use.

‘The Curran’ at Larne, Co. Antrim, is a raised beach deposit that has yielded thousands of flint tools.2 While much of the material may derive from Later Mesolithic activity, its strategic location near major flint sources means it was almost certainly a key area for raw material procurement from the earliest period of settlement. Such sites represent important nodes in the landscape where initial stages of tool manufacture occurred.

The Ballmaglaff area of Dundonald, Co. Down, is another locality known for extensive Mesolithic activity, having produced thousands of pieces of struck flint over many years of fieldwalking and investigation.¹⁸ While specific dating of all this material to the Earlier Mesolithic requires further refinement, such dense scatters point to areas of repeated or intensive activity related to tool manufacture and use, effectively mapping out the “working landscapes” of these early people.

The presence of Mesolithic material on Inishtrahull, a remote island off the Co. Donegal coast, provides further, albeit indirect, confirmation of the sophisticated seafaring capabilities of these groups, as accessing such an island would have required robust watercraft and navigational skills.³ The precise dating of this material to the Earlier Mesolithic phase would further strengthen this assertion for the initial colonisation period.

Finally, while pre-dating the main Mesolithic settlement phase, the cut-marked bear bone from Alice & Gwendoline Cave, Co. Clare, dated to c. 10,800-10,500 BC (Late Palaeolithic), provides crucial context for the earliest, albeit sporadic, human presence in Ireland, setting the stage for the continuous settlement that began around 8000 BC.²

7. The Genetic Blueprint: Insights into the First Irish People

Recent advances in ancient DNA (aDNA) analysis have begun to shed unprecedented light on the genetic makeup, physical characteristics, and population affinities of Ireland’s earliest inhabitants, offering a new dimension to our understanding of these pioneer communities.

Physical Traits and Genetic Affinities with European Contemporaries

Genetic material extracted from the rare remains of Irish Mesolithic hunter-gatherers has shown that they were most closely related to contemporary hunter-gatherer populations from Britain, exemplified by individuals like “Cheddar Man” from Somerset, England, and also to groups from Northwest mainland Europe.¹⁵ This shared genetic heritage places the first Irish settlers firmly within the broader Western Hunter-Gatherer genetic cluster that populated Europe after the last Ice Age.

Based on the genetic markers identified in these and other European Mesolithic individuals, it is inferred that the first Irish people likely possessed a striking combination of physical traits: very dark to black skin pigmentation, blue or green eyes, and dark curly or brown hair.³ This phenotype, particularly the combination of dark skin and light eyes, is now understood to be ancestral for European populations of this period.⁴⁹ The genetic variants responsible for paler skin, common in modern European populations, arrived later, primarily with the migrations of early farmers from the Near East during the Neolithic period.¹⁶ The physical appearance of Ireland’s first settlers would thus have been markedly different from that of present-day Irish populations. This contrast underscores the significant demographic shifts and genetic admixtures that have occurred on the island over the subsequent millennia, highlighting the evolving nature of “Irishness” from a genetic perspective.

The Signature of Island Isolation

A key finding from aDNA studies is the distinct genetic signature of prolonged island isolation observed in the earliest Irish Mesolithic genomes.¹⁵ This genetic isolation appears more pronounced than in contemporary British Mesolithic samples. This difference aligns well with palaeogeographical reconstructions: Britain maintained a land connection (Doggerland) to continental Europe for a longer period after the retreat of the glaciers, facilitating more continuous gene flow.¹⁶ Ireland, on the other hand, was separated by sea much earlier and more definitively. Its small founding populations, arriving by boat, would subsequently have experienced significantly reduced gene flow from Britain or the continent.

This early and sustained genetic isolation, beginning with the initial settlement by what were likely small pioneer groups, would have shaped the evolutionary trajectory of the Irish Mesolithic population over thousands of years. Genetic drift, a random process more impactful in small populations, could have led to the fixing of certain genetic traits and the loss of others. Furthermore, this relative isolation may also have influenced cultural development by limiting the influx of external ideas, technologies, and social practices, potentially fostering a more insular path of cultural evolution, as hinted at by the development of distinctively Irish toolkits in the Later Mesolithic.³

8. Conclusion: Pioneering an Island – Legacy and Future Enquiries

The Earlier Mesolithic period in Ireland, from approximately 8000 to 6700 BC, represents a foundational chapter in the island’s human narrative. It was an era defined by the courage and ingenuity of its first continuous settlers, who successfully navigated by sea to an island recently emerged from the grip of the Ice Age and embarked on the momentous task of adapting to its unique and dynamic post-glacial environment.¹ These pioneers developed a distinct hunter-gatherer-fisher lifestyle, characterized by a diversified subsistence strategy finely tuned to the available insular resources – notably the absence of red deer and a reliance on wild boar, fish, birds, and plants like hazelnuts.¹ Their technological hallmark was a sophisticated microlithic toolkit, featuring characteristic forms such as needle points and scalene triangles, alongside the early use of polished stone axes, demonstrating advanced craftsmanship and functional adaptation.¹ Sites like Mount Sandel offer remarkable insights into their dwellings and daily life, while the Hermitage burial reveals a complex spiritual and ritual dimension from the very outset of their tenure.²⁰ Genetic studies further paint a picture of these early Irish as being closely related to other Western European hunter-gatherers but also marked by a significant degree of island isolation.¹⁵

Despite considerable advances in our understanding, the study of Mesolithic Ireland is an ongoing endeavour, with many questions remaining and exciting avenues for future research. The exploration of submerged landscapes holds immense potential for discovering earlier and more extensive coastal sites, which are currently underrepresented due to post-glacial sea-level rise.⁷ Continued ancient DNA research will undoubtedly refine our knowledge of population origins, internal diversity, the precise nature and impact of genetic isolation, and connections with Britain and the continent.¹⁵ More detailed use-wear analysis on a wider array of microlithic tools can provide clearer insights into their specific functions and the range of activities undertaken.⁸ The identification and excavation of new Early Mesolithic sites, particularly in less-explored inland regions and uplands (if such sites exist), are crucial for understanding the full spectrum of settlement patterns and regional variability.⁵⁰ The precise nature and chronology of the watercraft used for the initial colonisation and subsequent internal navigation remain an area ripe for further investigation, relying on indirect evidence and comparative studies until direct finds emerge.³ Finally, building upon the evocative evidence from sites like Hermitage, further research into the social structures, belief systems, and ritual practices of these first communities will continue to enrich our appreciation of their complex human experience.²⁹ The legacy of these first pioneers is profound; they were the true first settlers who transformed a wild, post-glacial island into a human-inhabited landscape, laying the cultural and adaptive foundations upon which all subsequent Irish history was built. Future research, leveraging new scientific techniques and a continued commitment to exploring challenging archaeological contexts, promises to further illuminate the remarkable story of Mesolithic Ireland.

Works cited

1. The Archaeology of Ireland: from the Mesolithic to the Modern Era, accessed on May 23, 2025, https://irisharchaeology.org/the-archaeology-of-ireland-from-the-mesolithic-to-the-modern-era/
2. Mesolithic Archaeology of Ireland: The First Hunter-Gatherer Settlements, accessed on May 23, 2025, https://irisharchaeology.org/mesolithic-archaeology-of-ireland-the-first-hunter-gatherer-settlements/
3. www.heritagecouncil.ie, accessed on May 23, 2025, https://www.heritagecouncil.ie/content/files/Our-Ancient-Landscapes-Hunter-Gatherers-in-Ireland.pdf
4. Student Study Notes – Irish Quaternary Association, accessed on May 23, 2025, http://iqua.ie/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/IQUA-Shaping-the-Landscape-STUDY-NOTES.pdf
5. Prehistoric Ireland – Wikipedia, accessed on May 23, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prehistoric_Ireland
6. Introduction to the Late Quaternary and Holocene of Northern Ireland, accessed on May 23, 2025, https://www.habitas.org.uk/escr/site.asp?Item=101
7. The Mesolithic Maritime Landscape on the North Coast of Ireland – ResearchGate, accessed on May 23, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230342230_The_Mesolithic_Maritime_Landscape_on_the_North_Coast_of_Ireland
8. Microlith to macrolith: the reasons behind the transformation of production in the Irish Mesolithic – Cambridge University Press, accessed on May 23, 2025, https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/86B82A7A56F2E76C24D4E287579A5705/S0003598X00113675a.pdf/microlith-to-macrolith-the-reasons-behind-the-transformation-of-production-in-the-irish-mesolithic.pdf
9. Bridges & Species: Post-Glacial Colonisation – AskAboutIreland.ie, accessed on May 23, 2025, https://www.askaboutireland.ie/reading-room/environment-geography/flora-fauna/Flora-and-fauna/bridges-species-post-glac/
10. cms.nationalmuseumsni.org, accessed on May 23, 2025, https://cms.nationalmuseumsni.org/sites/default/files/2022-09/nmni-ancient-ireland-3-who-lived-in-ireland-before-neolithic-times_0.pdf
11. Logboats in history: West Highland evidence – Journals – Society of Antiquaries of Scotland, accessed on May 23, 2025, http://journals.socantscot.org/index.php/psas/article/download/10066/10033
12. The Mesolithic (Middle Stone Age) c.8000 BCE – Michael Gibbons Archaeology Travel, accessed on May 23, 2025, https://walkingireland.com/the-mesolithic-middle-stone-age-10000-years-ago/
13. Boats and Shipwrecks of Ireland | January 2006 (110.1) | American …, accessed on May 23, 2025, https://ajaonline.org/book-review/419/
14. Mesolithic Stone Age in Prehistoric Ireland – Wesley Johnston, accessed on May 23, 2025, https://www.wesleyjohnston.com/users/ireland/past/pre_norman_history/mesolithic_age.html
15. www.qub.ac.uk, accessed on May 23, 2025, https://www.qub.ac.uk/Research/our-research/research-explore/feature/ancient-dna-reveals-inbreeding-among-dynastic-elite/#:~:text=Genomes%20from%20the%20rare%20remains,of%20a%20prolonged%20island%20isolation.
16. Queen’s academic study reveals ancient DNA Reveals Inbreeding …, accessed on May 23, 2025, https://www.qub.ac.uk/Research/our-research/research-explore/feature/ancient-dna-reveals-inbreeding-among-dynastic-elite/
17. Insularisation and isolation? Aligning the Mesolithics of Britain and Ireland – ResearchGate, accessed on May 23, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/391183069_Insularisation_and_isolation_Aligning_the_Mesolithics_of_Britain_and_Ireland
18. Irish Mesolithic – Wikipedia, accessed on May 23, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irish_Mesolithic
19. Climate Panic and Butterflies – Butterfly Conservation Ireland, accessed on May 23, 2025, https://butterflyconservation.ie/wp/2024/01/10/climate-panic-and-butterflies/
20. Mount Sandel Mesolithic site – Wikipedia, accessed on May 23, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Sandel_Mesolithic_site
21. Phylogeographic, ancient DNA, fossil and morphometric analyses …, accessed on May 23, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236858071_Phylogeographic_ancient_DNA_fossil_and_morphometric_analyses_reveal_ancient_and_modern_introductions_of_a_large_mammal_The_complex_case_of_red_deer_Cervus_elaphus_in_Ireland
22. Mesolithic Age In Donegal Ireland, accessed on May 23, 2025, http://www.ourdonegal.com/mesolithic-age.html
23. Mount Sandel – Mesolithic Settlement in Ireland – ThoughtCo, accessed on May 23, 2025, https://www.thoughtco.com/mount-sandel-mesolithic-settlement-in-ireland-171665
24. (PDF) Ireland’s Ancient Deer – ResearchGate, accessed on May 23, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236859627_Ireland’s_Ancient_Deer
25. Mesolithic – Iron Age | Heritage Ireland, accessed on May 23, 2025, https://heritageireland.ie/articles/mesolithic-iron-age-8000bc-400ad/
26. Lough Boora Discovery Park • Archaeology • Visitor Guide 2025, accessed on May 23, 2025, https://www.tuatha.ie/lough-boora-discovery-park/
27. Lough Boora, County Offaly – Time Travel Ireland, accessed on May 23, 2025, http://timetravelireland.blogspot.com/2013/02/lough-boora-county-offaly.html
28. The Early Mesolithic: 7900-5500BC, accessed on May 23, 2025, https://www.mountsandel.com/teachers/meso_period.asp
29. eprints.whiterose.ac.uk, accessed on May 23, 2025, https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/191443/1/stone_dead_uncovering_early_mesolithic_mortuary_rites_hermitage_ireland.pdf
30. Stone Dead: Uncovering Early Mesolithic Mortuary Rites, Hermitage, Ireland | Request PDF, accessed on May 23, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309323827_Stone_Dead_Uncovering_Early_Mesolithic_Mortuary_Rites_Hermitage_Ireland
31. The Mesolithic – The Scottish Archaeological Research Framework, accessed on May 23, 2025, https://scarf.scot/wp-content/uploads/sites/15/2022/04/02_Mesolithic-002.pdf
32. The Mesolithic and Mesolithic-Neolithic transition in Ireland chapter 3, accessed on May 23, 2025, https://www.lithicsireland.ie/mlitt_mesolithic_west_ireland_chap_3.html
33. Stone Axe – Museum of Stone Tools, accessed on May 23, 2025, https://stonetoolsmuseum.com/artefact/europe/stone-axe-4/1710/
34. During the Palaeolithic (Old Stone Age) period, much of Ireland was covered by ice sheets., accessed on May 23, 2025, https://www.museum.ie/en-ie/collections-research/irish-antiquities-division-collections/collections-list-(1)/stone-age/prehistoric-details
35. Mesolithic – Wikipedia, accessed on May 23, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mesolithic
36. Mesolithic Art – Art and Visual Culture: Prehistory to Renaissance, accessed on May 23, 2025, https://pressbooks.bccampus.ca/cavestocathedrals/chapter/mesolithic/
37. Mesolithic | Definition, Technology, & Facts – Britannica, accessed on May 23, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/event/Mesolithic
38. Flint | National Museum of Ireland | Bronze Age Handling Box, accessed on May 23, 2025, https://microsites.museum.ie/bronzeagehandlingbox/object-flint.html
39. flint – Natuurtijdschriften, accessed on May 23, 2025, https://natuurtijdschriften.nl/pub/568108/STAR1981006001044.pdf
40. Knapping Antrim flint in Northern Ireland to make a Prehistoric stone axehead – YouTube, accessed on May 23, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=os9k7x3kir8
41. A late Mesolithic lithic scatter from Corralanna, Co. Westmeath – Research Repository UCD, accessed on May 23, 2025, https://researchrepository.ucd.ie/rest/bitstreams/7926/retrieve
42. (PDF) ‘They wrought almost any material that came in their way’: Mesolithic Flint Alternatives in the West of Ireland – ResearchGate, accessed on May 23, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254902762_’They_wrought_almost_any_material_that_came_in_their_way’_Mesolithic_Flint_Alternatives_in_the_West_of_Ireland
43. Microburin technique – Wikipedia, accessed on May 23, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microburin_technique
44. (PDF) On the origin and significance of microburins: An experimental approach, accessed on May 23, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/241685342_On_the_origin_and_significance_of_microburins_An_experimental_approach
45. OLD FAMILIES OF LARNE & DISTRICT – download, accessed on May 23, 2025, https://download.e-bookshelf.de/download/0000/8399/35/L-X-0000839935-0005473372.XHTML/index.xhtml
46. Mountsandel – The first sighting of man in Ireland – The Old Mount Manor, accessed on May 23, 2025, https://www.theoldmountmanor.com/history-of-mountsandel
47. Mountsandel Forest and Fort – Binevenagh Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, accessed on May 23, 2025, https://binevenaghaonb.ccght.org/mountsandel-forest-fort/
48. Analysis Of Cheddar Man’s DNA Reveals First Britons Were Black | DigVentures, accessed on May 23, 2025, https://digventures.com/2018/02/analysis-of-cheddar-mans-dna-reveals-first-britons-were-black/
49. Cheddar Man: Mesolithic Britain’s blue-eyed boy | Natural History Museum, accessed on May 23, 2025, https://www.nhm.ac.uk/discover/cheddar-man-mesolithic-britain-blue-eyed-boy.html
50. The Irish Mesolithic and Developer-led Archaeology – Institute of Archaeologists of Ireland, accessed on May 23, 2025, http://www.iai.ie/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Proceedings-of-the-IAI-Spring-2013-Conference.pdf