Before the Ice Melted: Ireland’s Palaeolithic – Fleeting Footprints in a Frozen Land

I. Introduction: Ireland’s Palaeolithic Enigma – A Land Before the Ice Melted

A. The Profound Challenge of Ireland’s Deep Past

The quest to understand the earliest human presence in Ireland is a journey into a deep and often obscured past. Uncovering and interpreting evidence from the Palaeolithic, or Old Stone Age, is inherently challenging globally, but these difficulties are amplified in an insular context such as Ireland. The island’s geological and environmental history, particularly the extensive glaciations that reshaped its surface and the subsequent dramatic changes in sea level, has created a complex taphonomic filter through which only the most resilient or fortuitously preserved traces of early human activity might survive.¹ For decades, even centuries, archaeologists have diligently searched for definitive proof of Palaeolithic occupation, a pursuit that has often been met with tantalizing but frustratingly scarce evidence.³ This long history of inquiry underscores the enigmatic nature of Ireland’s earliest human chapter, a period that remains one of the most elusive in European prehistory. The very scarcity of finds has, in itself, shaped the research landscape, demanding innovative methodologies and a critical approach to any potential discovery. The “elusive” character of the Irish Palaeolithic is thus a consequence not only of potentially minimal human presence but also of the profound geological and environmental forces that have acted upon the island over millennia. The vast ice sheets of the Midlandian glaciation, for instance, would have scoured much of the landscape, erasing or deeply burying any earlier traces of human activity.¹ Following the retreat of the ice, rising sea levels inundated former coastlines, which are often prime locations for early human settlement, further obscuring the record.² Ireland’s early and persistent status as an island, isolated from Britain and mainland Europe, also likely limited the frequency and scale of human incursions compared to regions connected by land bridges.¹ Therefore, the story of Ireland’s Palaeolithic is one of piecing together fragments from a deeply fractured and partially lost record.

B. “Fleeting Footprints”: Defining Sporadic Presence

The phrase “fleeting footprints” aptly describes the current understanding of human presence in Ireland during the Palaeolithic. It suggests sporadic, non-continuous incursions rather than established, permanent settlements. This interpretation aligns with the archaeological record, which, to date, consists of a few key sites with contested or limited evidence, rather than a widespread distribution of Palaeolithic findspots or complex material culture assemblages.¹ This contrasts sharply with the evidence for the subsequent Mesolithic period (Middle Stone Age), from approximately 8000 BC, which reveals more substantial and widespread hunter-gatherer settlements, such as Mount Sandel in County Derry.⁸ The qualitative difference between the Palaeolithic traces and the Mesolithic record highlights the potentially different nature of human engagement with the Irish landscape during these two distinct prehistoric epochs. The Palaeolithic evidence, where it exists, points more towards exploratory visits, seasonal hunting parties, or perhaps short-lived, ultimately unsuccessful, attempts at colonization by small, mobile groups.

C. Significance of the Palaeolithic in the Irish Archaeological Narrative

Despite its ephemeral nature, the investigation of Ireland’s Palaeolithic is of profound significance. Any confirmed evidence of human presence during this period pushes back the timeline of human interaction with the Irish landmass by thousands of years, fundamentally altering our understanding of the island’s deep history.³ It suggests that long before the first Mesolithic settlers established more permanent communities, the island was known, visited, and perhaps even briefly inhabited by Palaeolithic pioneers. Understanding this earliest phase is crucial for comprehending the subsequent patterns of human colonization and adaptation. It provides a baseline against which later prehistoric developments can be measured and offers insights into the resilience and exploratory capacity of Late Pleistocene human populations. The narrative of the Irish Palaeolithic is also a dynamic one, characterized by ongoing revision as new analytical techniques are applied to previously discovered materials. Discoveries such as the re-dating of faunal remains from Castlepook Cave ¹ or the analysis of the bear patella from Alice and Gwendoline Cave ⁵ demonstrate that museum collections and old excavation archives can yield new and transformative information. This process of re-evaluation underscores the potential for future breakthroughs and the evolving nature of our understanding of this deep past.

D. Report Trajectory: Navigating the Evidence and Debates

This report aims to navigate the complex evidence and scholarly debates surrounding Ireland’s Palaeolithic period. It will begin by examining the dramatic environmental conditions of the Late Pleistocene, a time of immense climatic upheaval that shaped the Irish landscape. Subsequently, it will delve into the key archaeological discoveries that suggest a human presence, focusing on sites such as Alice and Gwendoline Cave and Castlepook Cave. The challenges faced by any Palaeolithic groups attempting to survive in this harsh environment will be explored, followed by a contextualization of the Irish finds within the broader Palaeolithic of Northwest Europe. Finally, the report will consider the unanswered questions and future directions for research, highlighting the ongoing quest to illuminate these “fleeting footprints in a frozen land.”

II. The Frozen Canvas: Ireland During the Late Pleistocene

A. The Midlandian Glaciation: Sculpting a Tabula Rasa?

The landscape encountered by any potential Palaeolithic visitors to Ireland was profoundly shaped by the preceding ice ages, particularly the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM), known locally as the Midlandian glaciation. During its peak, around 20,000 years ago, vast ice sheets covered much, if not all, of Ireland, extending from major accumulation centres and coalescing into a formidable ice cap.¹ The immense weight and movement of this ice had a dramatic impact, scouring bedrock, eroding pre-existing landforms, and depositing vast quantities of glacial till, sands, and gravels. This process would have effectively acted as a geological eraser, likely obliterating most, if not all, surface evidence of any earlier human presence and creating the foundational post-glacial terrain upon which subsequent ecosystems and human activities would develop. The Midlandian glaciation is recognized as having ended approximately 11,700 years ago, leaving behind a landscape initially characterized by arctic tundra conditions – a cold, treeless environment with permafrost in places.¹ This “tabula rasa” effect means that the search for Palaeolithic evidence is often a search for sites that were either protected from glacial action (e.g., deep caves) or were occupied in the relatively brief windows of time after the ice retreated but before the full establishment of Holocene conditions.

B. Climatic Oscillations: A Dynamic Environmental Backdrop

The Late Pleistocene was not a period of static cold but was characterized by significant and often abrupt climatic oscillations that dramatically influenced the environment of Northwest Europe, including Ireland.

1. The Bølling-Allerød Interstadial (c. 14,700 – 12,900 cal BP): A Fleeting Warmth

Following the harsh conditions of the LGM, a significant warming trend, known as the Bølling-Allerød Interstadial, commenced around 14,700 calibrated years Before Present (cal BP).1 This period of ameliorated climate led to the widespread retreat of ice sheets across Europe and allowed for the northward expansion of flora, fauna, and, consequently, human hunter-gatherer groups.1 In Ireland, this warming would have facilitated the development of nascent woodlands, likely dominated by pioneer species such as birch and willow, and grasslands, making the island potentially more habitable than in the preceding millennia.6 While Britain, still connected to continental Europe by Doggerland, saw the presence of Magdalenian hunter-gatherers during this interstadial 11, evidence for human activity in Ireland during the Bølling-Allerød is notably delayed or absent until its very end or the beginning of the subsequent cold phase. This lag in colonization is likely attributable to Ireland’s distinct island biogeography and its more limited faunal diversity compared to Britain, which possessed a richer array of large herbivores attractive to Palaeolithic hunters.6

2. The Younger Dryas Stadial (c. 12,900 – 11,700 cal BP): The Big Freeze Returns

The relative warmth of the Bølling-Allerød was dramatically interrupted by the Younger Dryas stadial, an abrupt return to cold, near-glacial conditions that lasted for over a millennium.8 This climatic downturn had a profound impact across the Northern Hemisphere, leading to the re-advance of glaciers in some areas, a shift in vegetation back towards open, cold-adapted species, and significant challenges for human populations. In Britain, the Younger Dryas is associated with a decline in human activity and eventual abandonment of the island by hunter-gatherer groups.11 Paradoxically, it is during this harsh and volatile period that the most compelling, albeit still debated, evidence for human presence in Ireland emerges, notably the butchered bear patella from Alice and Gwendoline Cave, dated to the onset of or during the Younger Dryas.6 This raises intriguing questions about the adaptive strategies and motivations of any human groups present in Ireland at this time. It is conceivable that the deteriorating conditions in Britain or continental Europe may have acted as a “push” factor, prompting exploratory forays into new, potentially marginal territories like Ireland, representing a diversification of hunter-gatherer strategies in difficult times.6

C. The Palaeoenvironment: A Shifting Mosaic

The palaeoenvironment of Palaeolithic Ireland was a dynamic mosaic, constantly responding to these climatic shifts. Immediately following the retreat of the Midlandian ice, the landscape would have been an arctic tundra.1 During the warmer phases of the Bølling-Allerød, this would have gradually given way to pioneering birch and willow woodlands, interspersed with grasslands. The onset of the Younger Dryas would have seen a reversion to more open, cold-adapted vegetation, with a reduction in tree cover.

Crucially, sea levels were also in flux. By 14,000 years ago, Ireland was already an island, isolated from Britain, which itself remained connected to continental Europe via the landmass of Doggerland for a considerable period.1 This insularity is a critical factor in understanding potential migration routes and the distinct faunal and human colonization history of Ireland compared to its larger neighbour. The changes to the environment, driven by climate, would have had a determining impact on the lifeways of any hunter-gatherers present, influencing resource availability, mobility patterns, and the overall viability of occupation.11

D. Megafauna of Palaeolithic Ireland: The Quaternary Faunal Record

The potential resource base for any Palaeolithic humans in Ireland was the diverse, though perhaps less abundant than in mainland Europe, range of megafauna that inhabited the island during the Late Pleistocene. The Irish Quaternary Faunal Project and other research have shed considerable light on these species, though the interpretation of this record is complicated by taphonomic issues in cave deposits and historical inaccuracies in dating.¹³ Many faunal assemblages derive from early 20th-century cave excavations where deposits were often disturbed, and re-dating efforts have significantly altered previous chronologies.¹³ Nevertheless, a picture of the Late Pleistocene bestiary can be drawn.

Key species included the Woolly Mammoth (Mammuthus primigenius), the iconic Giant Deer (Megaloceros giganteus), Reindeer (Rangifer tarandus), Brown Bear (Ursus arctos), Spotted Hyaena (Crocuta crocuta), Wolf (Canis lupus), and Arctic Fox (Alopex lagopus).¹³ The timing of their presence varied. For example, some evidence suggests a pioneering phase after 40,000 BP with hyaena, mammoth, and reindeer, followed by a consolidation phase around 28,000-26,000 BP where a broader range, possibly including temperate elements, was present.¹³ Remarkably, some high arctic fauna like mammoth and Arctic fox appear to have survived in Ireland until close to the LGM, around 20,000 BP.¹³ After the LGM, during the Lateglacial period (including the Bølling-Allerød and Younger Dryas), a more restricted range re-colonized, with Giant Deer flourishing particularly during the Woodgrange Interstadial (part of the Bølling-Allerød complex), with most dates falling between 12,000 BP and 10,800 BP.¹³ Reindeer were also present during this Lateglacial period. Notably, there is a lack of evidence for Red Deer (Cervus elaphus) and Horse (Equus caballus) in Ireland during the Lateglacial or Early Holocene; horse, for instance, is only documented from around 4,000 BP.¹³ This absence of certain key prey animals, especially horse, which was crucial to Magdalenian groups in Britain and Europe ¹¹, further underscores the unique ecological context of Palaeolithic Ireland.

Table 1: Significant Pleistocene Megafauna in Ireland and their Chronological Range

Species (Common Name)	Species (Scientific Name)	Earliest Evidence (approx. BP / cal BP)	Latest Evidence (approx. BP / cal BP)	Key Cave Sites where found	Notes
Woolly Mammoth	Mammuthus primigenius	>40,000 BP (Pioneering Phase)	c. 20,000 BP (Survival Phase pre-LGM)	Castlepook, Shandon	Extinct. Potential prey. Baby mammoth tooth found at Castlepook.13
Giant Deer	Megaloceros giganteus	Lateglacial	c. 10,800 BP	Ballybetagh, Castlepook, Alice & Gwendoline	Extinct. Flourished during Woodgrange Interstadial. Contemporary with potential human presence in Younger Dryas.10
Reindeer	Rangifer tarandus	>40,000 BP (Pioneering Phase)	Lateglacial (e.g., Keshcorran, Castlepook)	Castlepook, Keshcorran, Alice & Gwendoline	Key prey species. Cut-marked bone dated to 33,000 BP at Castlepook.1 Present during Younger Dryas.10
Brown Bear	Ursus arctos	>40,000 BP (Pioneering Phase)	Holocene (up to c. 3,000 BP)	Castlepook, Shandon, Ballynamintra, Alice & Gwendoline	Potential prey/competitor. Butchered patella dated to c. 12,500 cal BP from Alice & Gwendoline Cave.10
Spotted Hyaena	Crocuta crocuta	>45,000 BP (Castlepook)	Pre-LGM	Castlepook	Scavenger. Presence indicates earlier faunal communities.13
Wolf	Canis lupus	Lateglacial	Holocene	Castlepook	Predator. Survived Nahanagan Stadial into Holocene.13
Arctic Fox	Alopex lagopus	c. 20,000 BP (Survival Phase pre-LGM)	Lateglacial	Shandon, Castlepook	Indicator of cold, arctic conditions.13
Arctic Lemming	Dicrostonyx torquatus	c. 20,000 BP (Castlepook)	Lateglacial	Castlepook	Microfauna indicative of arctic tundra environment.13
Hare	Lepus sp.	Lateglacial	Holocene	Castlepook	Likely Irish Hare (Lepus timidus hibernicus). Survived Nahanagan Stadial into Holocene.13

Note: Dates are approximate and subject to ongoing research and refinement. “BP” generally refers to radiocarbon years Before Present, while “cal BP” refers to calibrated years Before Present. The chronological phases (Pioneering, Consolidation, Survival) are based on Woodman et al.’s Quaternary Fauna Project synthesis.¹³

The presence or absence of these species at particular times, and in particular locations, directly influenced the subsistence opportunities available to any human groups venturing into Ireland. A robust understanding of this dynamic faunal landscape, therefore, relies heavily on continued, precise dating of faunal remains and careful taphonomic analysis of cave assemblages to distinguish natural accumulations from potential human-modified deposits.

III. Fleeting Footprints: The Elusive Evidence of Palaeolithic Humans

A. Defining the Irish Palaeolithic: Chronological Boundaries and Shifting Paradigms

The definition of the Irish Palaeolithic is, itself, a subject of ongoing refinement, largely dictated by the emergence of new evidence and the re-evaluation of older finds. Conventionally, the period is understood to encompass the earliest signs of human presence, however sporadic, up to the beginning of more sustained and widespread settlement characteristic of the Mesolithic period, which is generally considered to start around 8000 BC (c. 10,000 cal BP).1 For many years, the prevailing view, as articulated by institutions like the National Museum of Ireland, was that there was “no clear evidence” for a human presence in Ireland during the Palaeolithic.7 This perspective has been challenged and significantly revised in recent decades.

The earliest currently cited date for potential human activity is a reindeer bone fragment from Castlepook Cave, Co. Cork, which was re-dated in 2021 to approximately 33,000 years ago.1 However, this find remains somewhat enigmatic and requires further contextualization and confirmation of anthropogenic modification. More widely discussed and robust, though still debated, is the evidence from Alice and Gwendoline Cave, Co. Clare, where a butchered bear patella has been dated to c. 12,500 years ago (c. 10,500 BC).3 This latter find, if fully accepted, places human activity firmly within the Late Upper Palaeolithic, coinciding with the Younger Dryas climatic period.

The transition to the Mesolithic is marked by a notable increase in the visibility and density of archaeological sites, such as Mount Sandel, Co. Derry, dated to around 7000 BC 1, and a characteristic lithic technology (microliths).8 The contrast between the sparse, often cave-derived Palaeolithic evidence and the more abundant Mesolithic record underscores the different scales and possibly different natures of human presence in these two eras. The Irish Palaeolithic, therefore, remains a period defined more by isolated, “fleeting footprints” than by a continuous cultural sequence, and its chronological boundaries are subject to change as research progresses.1

B. Alice and Gwendoline Cave, Co. Clare: A Turning Point in Irish Prehistory?

The discoveries at Alice and Gwendoline Cave have been pivotal in reshaping the debate about Ireland’s earliest inhabitants.

1. Site Discovery and Excavation History:

Alice and Gwendoline Cave is a limestone cave system located near Ennis, Co. Clare, situated within a Lower Carboniferous limestone outcrop.10 The cave was first systematically investigated in 1902 under the direction of Richard J. Ussher, as part of the work of the Committee Appointed to Explore Irish Caves. These early excavations were noted for their relatively high methodological standards for the time.10 The investigations yielded a substantial quantity of animal bone fragments (between 10,000 and 15,000), including remains of extinct fauna, as well as a small number of human bones and over twenty artefacts spanning various periods, from stone tools to Viking-age items.10 The mixed nature of these finds indicated that the cave’s stratigraphy had been disturbed over time, a common issue in cave archaeology.

2. The Butchered Bear Patella: The Key Evidence:

The most significant find for Palaeolithic studies emerged much later. In 2011, while re-analysing animal bone collections housed in the National Museum of Ireland, osteoarchaeologist Dr. Ruth Carden identified a bear patella (kneecap) from the 1902 Alice and Gwendoline Cave excavations that bore distinct cut marks.5 This patella was subsequently subjected to radiocarbon dating at two independent laboratories (Queen’s University Belfast and University of Oxford).5 The results were consistent, yielding dates around 12,810-12,590 cal BP and 12,730-12,685 cal BP, which translates to approximately 10,860–10,641 cal BC.3 This places the butchery event firmly in the Late Upper Palaeolithic, specifically during the Younger Dryas cold period.

Detailed analysis of the patella by multiple bone specialists confirmed that the seven cut marks present were inflicted on fresh bone, likely with a sharp flint tool.4 The location and nature of these marks suggest an attempt to disarticulate the knee joint, possibly to extract tendons for use as cordage.5 The unweathered condition of the bone further suggests that the butchery event occurred at or very near the cave entrance, rather than the bone being transported there much later.4 This groundbreaking research, led by Dr. Marion Dowd and Dr. Ruth Carden, was published in the prestigious journal Quaternary Science Reviews in 2016, significantly impacting the field of Irish archaeology.5

3. Scholarly Interpretations and Debates:

The dating of the Alice and Gwendoline bear patella has been hailed as a major breakthrough, potentially pushing back the timeline of human presence in Ireland by some 2,500 years from the previously accepted Mesolithic evidence at Mount Sandel.3 Dr. Dowd described it as “the first piece of the jigsaw” in the long search for the Irish Palaeolithic.4

However, the find is not without its scholarly debate. The timing, during the climatically harsh Younger Dryas, has raised questions. Archaeologist Graeme Warren has suggested that while Ireland would have been inhospitable, making significant human activity unlikely, exploratory visits from northern Europe remain possible.10 Conversely, archaeologist Jesse Tune has argued that sustained human habitation in Ireland would not have been viable until the Holocene due to the prevailing climatic and ecological conditions. Tune also raised concerns about the certainty of attributing the cut marks to human action without more precise geoarchaeological investigation of the cave’s sediments and the recovery of associated, similarly-dated artefacts.10

Subsequent investigations at Alice and Gwendoline Cave between 2019 and 2020, including new excavations and analyses, have confirmed the contemporary presence of other Late Pleistocene fauna such as giant deer, reindeer, and brown bear during the period indicated by the patella, thus providing a plausible ecological context for human hunters.10

C. Castlepook Cave, Co. Cork: Deeper Echoes from the Ice Age

Castlepook Cave, located near Doneraile in County Cork, has also emerged as a site of considerable interest for understanding Ireland’s deeper Palaeolithic past, potentially offering even earlier evidence of human activity.

1. Site Context and Investigation History:

Like Alice and Gwendoline, Castlepook Cave (also known as Doneraile Cave) was subject to significant antiquarian excavations in the early 20th century (and even earlier, in the 19th century), which yielded a rich assemblage of Pleistocene faunal remains.15 For many years, these collections remained largely unexamined with modern techniques. The site has recently become the focus of renewed investigation by the “Castlepook Cave Project,” co-directed by Dr. Richard Jennings and Dr. Ruth Carden. This renewed interest was spurred by Dr. Carden’s identification of animal bones from the old collections that exhibit potential cut marks, hinting at human interaction during the Ice Age.15 The project employs a suite of modern archaeological and geophysical techniques, including Electrical Resistance Tomography (ERT) and Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR), to map the full extent of the cave system, identify undisturbed sediment sequences, and locate potential new chambers or entrances.15

2. Faunal Assemblages and Potential Human Modifications:

The most striking piece of evidence from Castlepook is a reindeer bone fragment, originally discovered in 1972 but re-dated in 2021 using modern Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (AMS) techniques. This analysis yielded a date of approximately 33,000 years ago.1 If the associated modifications on this bone are confirmed as anthropogenic, this would represent by far the earliest evidence of human activity in Ireland, predating the Last Glacial Maximum.

Beyond this specific find, Dr. Carden has identified other bones, including reindeer remains from the early 20th-century excavations, that show signs of human modification, potentially dating to multiple phases of the last ice age cycle.15 Recent test excavations conducted by the Castlepook Cave Project in 2022 and 2024 have successfully identified stratified Pleistocene faunal-bearing deposits in previously unexplored or undisturbed areas of the cave system, such as “Hyaena Land” and “Elephant Hall”.15 These deposits have yielded remains of a typical Ice Age fauna, including brown bear, fox, hare, reindeer, Ice Age spotted hyaena, lemming, and even the rare discovery of an unerupted partial deciduous tooth of a baby woolly mammoth.15

3. Dating Challenges and the Search for Definitive Palaeolithic Horizons:

A significant challenge in interpreting the Castlepook evidence, and indeed that from many Irish caves, lies in the accuracy of older radiocarbon dates. Advances in dating techniques and sample pre-treatment since the 1990s have shown that some earlier dates may not be reliable.14 The Castlepook Cave Project is addressing this by undertaking a new program of dating on newly recovered faunal samples and, where possible, re-dating material from old collections using multiple techniques, including radiocarbon dating, Optically Stimulated Luminescence (OSL), and uranium-series dating.15

A primary objective of the current research is to locate definitive, in-situ evidence of Palaeolithic human occupation, such as stone tools (lithics), hearth features, or further examples of clearly modified bone, directly associated with these dated faunal remains.15 The discovery of such evidence would be crucial for confirming the nature and timing of human presence at Castlepook. The 33,000 BP date, while tantalizing, requires exceptionally robust evidence of human agency to be fully accepted, given its isolation and the potential for natural processes to mimic cut marks on bone. If substantiated, it would imply a very early, perhaps even pre-LGM, human presence, which would dramatically alter current models of Ireland’s colonization.

D. Other Potential Traces: Whispers in the Geological Record

1. The Mell, Drogheda Flint:

One of the earliest finds often mentioned in discussions of the Irish Palaeolithic is a single worked flint discovered in 1968 at Mell, near Drogheda, Co. Louth.1 This artefact, typologically, could be much older than other Irish Palaeolithic evidence, with some suggestions placing it as pre-dating 70,000 BC.1 However, the overwhelming consensus among archaeologists is that this flint was not manufactured or used by humans in Ireland at such an early date. Instead, it is believed to have been fashioned elsewhere, perhaps in what is now the bed of the Irish Sea or further afield, and subsequently transported to its find location by glacial ice sheets during one of the major Pleistocene glaciations.1 As such, while an intriguing find, it is generally not considered indicative of an in-situ human presence in Ireland during the Lower or Middle Palaeolithic.

2. Brief Discussion of Other Contested or Poorly Dated Finds:

Over the years, other isolated finds or claims for Palaeolithic presence have occasionally surfaced, but these have generally lacked the robust dating, clear anthropogenic signature, or secure archaeological context necessary for widespread acceptance. This reinforces the “elusive” nature of the Irish Palaeolithic and highlights the critical importance of rigorous scientific scrutiny for any potential evidence. The current archaeological landscape for the Irish Palaeolithic is dominated by the faunal evidence with cut marks from caves, with a conspicuous absence of associated Palaeolithic stone tool assemblages directly linked to these very early contexts.

Table 2: Key Potential Palaeolithic Sites/Finds in Ireland: Summary of Evidence

Site Name (County)	Type of Evidence	Key Species (if applicable)	Reported Date(s) (cal BP / BC)	Key Researchers/Publications	Current Interpretation/Debate
Alice & Gwendoline Cave (Clare)	Butchered Bone (Patella)	Brown Bear (Ursus arctos)	c. 12,810-12,590 cal BP (c. 10,860–10,641 cal BC)	Dowd & Carden (2016, Quaternary Science Reviews) 5	Strongest evidence for Late Upper Palaeolithic human activity (butchery). Dated to Younger Dryas. Debates exist regarding viability of occupation and certainty of marks.10
Castlepook Cave (Cork)	Modified Bone (Reindeer fragment, other potential)	Reindeer (Rangifer tarandus), other megafauna	Reindeer fragment: c. 33,000 BP. Other potential modifications from various Ice Age phases.	Carden, Jennings et al. (ongoing Castlepook Cave Project) 1	33,000 BP date is earliest for human activity if confirmed anthropogenic. Ongoing research to find in-situ evidence and refine dating. Older dates require careful scrutiny.14
Mell, Drogheda (Louth)	Lithic (Single worked flint)	N/A	Potentially pre-70,000 BC (based on typology, not direct dating)	(Original find 1968)	Generally considered an ice-transported artefact, not indicative of in-situ Palaeolithic human presence at that early date.1

The current understanding of the Irish Palaeolithic is overwhelmingly shaped by evidence from cave sites. Both Alice & Gwendoline and Castlepook are limestone caves, which offer environments conducive to the long-term preservation of bone and other organic materials that would typically perish in open-air settings, especially given Ireland’s subsequent glacial history and often acidic soils.¹ The Irish Quaternary Fauna Project, which has provided much of the chronological framework for Pleistocene animals, also relied heavily on material from cave excavations.¹³ While these cave sites are invaluable, this focus might inadvertently bias our perception of Palaeolithic activity. It is possible that early human groups utilized a wider range of landscape settings, but the traces of such activities in open-air locations have been largely erased or remain undiscovered. Future research may need to employ sophisticated predictive modeling and prospection techniques to identify potential non-cave sites in areas that might have offered some protection from glacial scour or are now submerged.

Furthermore, the most compelling evidence from these Irish Palaeolithic contexts – the butchered bear patella from Alice & Gwendoline and the cut-marked reindeer bones from Castlepook – points primarily towards resource exploitation, specifically the processing of animal carcasses.⁴ There is currently a notable absence of associated Palaeolithic stone tool assemblages directly and securely linked to these faunal remains at these early dates, nor is there evidence of hearths, shelters, or other features indicative of more sustained settlement. This contrasts with later Mesolithic sites like Mount Sandel, which have yielded remains of huts and a more diverse toolkit.⁸ This pattern supports the “fleeting footprints” model: small, mobile groups, perhaps specialist hunting parties, making brief incursions into Ireland to target specific large mammal resources, rather than establishing longer-term base camps. The technology they employed might have been expedient, curated and carried away, or simply left minimal diagnostic traces.

IV. Life on the Edge: Challenges and Adaptations of Ireland’s First Visitors

The existence of Palaeolithic humans in Ireland, however ephemeral, would have been a testament to their resilience and adaptability in the face of formidable environmental challenges. Life on this northwestern Atlantic fringe during the Late Pleistocene was undoubtedly a precarious undertaking.

A. Island Realities: Navigating Isolation and Resource Landscapes

From at least 14,000 BP, Ireland was an island, separated from Britain by a significant stretch of water.1 This insularity posed immediate challenges. Firstly, any human arrival necessitated a sea crossing. While Mesolithic populations who later colonized Ireland clearly possessed capable watercraft, as evidenced by their settlement of offshore islands like Inishtrahull 6, direct evidence for Palaeolithic seafaring capabilities is globally rare, though not entirely absent. The journey itself, even if relatively short from parts of Britain, would have been a significant undertaking, particularly in the often-unpredictable North Atlantic conditions. This requirement for a sea journey, potentially into the unknown, especially if groups were pushed from Britain or Europe during the Younger Dryas climatic deterioration 11, suggests a degree of maritime skill or perhaps a level of desperation.

Once on the island, Palaeolithic groups would have encountered a resource landscape that was distinct from, and generally less diverse than, that of Britain or continental Europe.6 The limited faunal diversity, a consequence of its island biogeography and glacial history, meant a narrower range of primary prey species. For example, the apparent absence of wild horse (Equus caballus) during the Irish Lateglacial 11, a key resource for contemporary Magdalenian hunters in Britain and Europe, would have necessitated different hunting strategies and technological adaptations. Instead, Irish Palaeolithic hunters would have focused on species like reindeer and brown bear, which, while valuable, present their own challenges in terms of hunting techniques and risk.13 The lack of early Holocene red deer also points to a different ecological trajectory.13 This faunal disparity meant that Palaeolithic groups could not simply transplant their existing subsistence strategies; they would have had to adapt to the specific conditions of the Irish environment or supplement their diet with smaller game, birds, fish, or coastal/marine resources, though direct evidence for the latter in the Irish Palaeolithic is currently lacking.

Furthermore, the island setting could have led to significant isolation for any small groups that did make landfall, limiting opportunities for contact, exchange of information, or demographic support from other populations.8 This isolation, combined with a potentially restricted resource base and a volatile climate, would have made sustained occupation exceptionally difficult and placed small founding populations at high risk of local extinction due to stochastic events such as disease, hunting failures, or accidents. The “fleeting” nature of the Palaeolithic footprints may, therefore, be a direct consequence of these compounded challenges, reflecting repeated small-scale, unsuccessful colonisation attempts or decisions to abandon the island due to its inherent harshness and unreliability.

B. Surviving the Chill: Human Resilience in a Harsh, Fluctuating Climate

The climatic backdrop for much of the potential Irish Palaeolithic, particularly during the Younger Dryas when the Alice and Gwendoline Cave evidence is dated, was one of extreme cold and instability.8 Surviving in such conditions would have demanded considerable adaptive flexibility and resilience. Effective hunting techniques tailored to the available fauna – such as reindeer, which are migratory, and bear, which can be dangerous quarry – would have been paramount. The manufacture and maintenance of efficient tools, likely from scarce high-quality flint or other suitable stone, would have been critical.

Appropriate clothing made from animal hides and furs, and the ability to construct or find adequate shelter, would have been essential for protection against the severe cold, wind, and precipitation. While direct evidence for Palaeolithic clothing or specific shelter types is absent in Ireland, inferences can be drawn from contemporary Late Upper Palaeolithic cultures in Europe, who utilized tailored clothing and constructed various forms of dwellings or used caves and rock shelters.

Mobility was almost certainly a key survival strategy, allowing groups to follow seasonally available resources, such as migratory animal herds, or to move to more sheltered locations during particularly harsh weather.6 This high degree of mobility, however, also contributes to the ephemeral nature of the archaeological record, as groups would have left minimal traces at any single location. Beyond the physical adaptations, survival would have depended on social cohesion, shared knowledge of the landscape and its resources, and the psychological fortitude to endure prolonged periods of hardship and uncertainty in small, isolated groups. The human groups who left their faint traces in Palaeolithic Ireland were operating at the very edge of the habitable world, and their presence, however brief, speaks to a remarkable capacity for exploration and endurance.

C. Interpreting Sporadic Presence: Ephemeral Hunting Parties or Short-Lived Settlements?

Given the current state of evidence, the Irish Palaeolithic is best characterized by sporadic human presence rather than continuous settlement. The primary data points – butchered animal bones at Alice and Gwendoline Cave and Castlepook Cave, and the isolated, likely ice-transported, Mell flint – lean towards interpretations of short-term, task-specific visits.4 These might represent exploratory expeditions by groups based elsewhere (perhaps in Britain before its final separation, or from continental Europe), or specialist hunting parties targeting specific resources like bear or reindeer, processing their kills, and then departing. The description of someone butchering a bear “inside the cave or at the cave entrance” at Alice and Gwendoline Cave evokes an image of a temporary camp focused on immediate subsistence needs rather than a long-term habitation site.4

The possibility of “failed colonizations” must also be considered – small groups attempting to establish a more permanent foothold but ultimately succumbing to the environmental challenges, resource limitations, or demographic pressures of isolation. The “fleeting footprints” metaphor thus aptly captures this light touch on the landscape, a series of brief encounters rather than a sustained occupation. This stands in marked contrast to the subsequent Mesolithic period, where sites like Mount Sandel provide evidence of more substantial structures, repeated occupation, and a broader adaptation to the Irish environment, including the exploitation of a wider range of resources such as fish, birds, and plant foods.8 The Irish Palaeolithic, therefore, seems to represent a different order of human engagement with the island, one characterized by exploration and ephemeral presence on a challenging frontier.

V. Contextualising the Irish Palaeolithic: Connections and Comparisons

Understanding the faint signals of Palaeolithic human presence in Ireland requires placing them within the broader context of Northwest European prehistory. This comparison highlights both the connections and, more strikingly, the divergences in the deep human history of the region.

A. Ireland and Britain: Divergent Palaeolithic Pathways

The Palaeolithic trajectories of Ireland and Britain, despite their geographical proximity, are markedly different, largely due to fundamental differences in their geological and environmental histories. For much of the Palaeolithic, Britain was not an island but a peninsula of continental Europe, connected via the vast, now-submerged landmass of Doggerland in the North Sea basin.1 This terrestrial connection facilitated easier and more frequent migrations of both fauna and human populations from the continent into Britain. Consequently, Britain possesses a much richer and deeper Palaeolithic record than Ireland. This includes evidence of Lower Palaeolithic occupation by earlier human species such as Homo heidelbergensis at sites like Boxgrove and Happisburgh, associated with Acheulean handaxe traditions, and Middle Palaeolithic presence of Neanderthals, who utilized Mousterian and Levallois technologies.2 There is currently no credible evidence for the presence of these earlier hominin species in Ireland.

Britain also has a more substantial Upper Palaeolithic record, including the Aurignacian, Gravettian, and later Creswellian cultures, with well-known sites such as Kent’s Cavern, Paviland Cave, and Creswell Crags.2 In contrast, the Irish Palaeolithic evidence, as currently understood, is sparse, significantly later (primarily Late Upper Palaeolithic), and lacks the clear cultural sequences seen in Britain.1

The impact of the Younger Dryas climatic deterioration further highlights this divergence. While this cold snap led to the apparent abandonment of Britain by hunter-gatherer groups 11, it is precisely during this period that the most discussed evidence for human activity in Ireland (the Alice and Gwendoline Cave bear patella) is dated.10 This suggests that Ireland, even in its harshness, might have been briefly explored or utilized by groups under pressure elsewhere. Ireland, therefore, represents an extreme example of the “peripheral” nature of human occupation in Northwest Europe during the Palaeolithic. If Britain was at the northwesternmost edge of the Pleistocene world 20, then Ireland, an island further to the west and isolated by sea from at least 14,000 BP 1, was even more marginal. The environmental barriers of extensive ice sheets and significant sea channels acted as powerful filters, severely limiting the opportunities for, and success of, early human colonization compared to Britain. The concept of Doggerland as a terrestrial bridge for Britain underscores precisely what Ireland lacked, a factor that fundamentally shaped its distinct prehistoric trajectory from a very early stage and necessitates an explanatory framework that foregrounds its insularity.

B. The Wider European Late Upper Palaeolithic Landscape: Parallels and Discontinuities

When situating the tentative Irish Palaeolithic evidence within the broader European Late Upper Palaeolithic landscape (c. 14,000 – 11,700 cal BP), it appears as a very faint echo of the more vibrant cultural developments seen on the continent. This period in Europe witnessed the flourishing of cultures such as the Magdalenian and later Federmesser and Ahrensburgian groups, characterized by sophisticated lithic and bone tool technologies, elaborate art, and complex hunting strategies adapted to the changing Lateglacial environments.21

General trends across Late Glacial Europe included significant population movements and demographic shifts, often in response to climatic changes such as the Bølling-Allerød warming and the Younger Dryas cooling.11 For instance, the warming phase saw northward and westward expansion of populations, while the Younger Dryas triggered contractions, abandonments, and migrations to potentially more favorable refugia or, perhaps, exploratory movements into new territories.11

The Irish evidence, if representing human groups originating from Britain or continental Europe, would signify a far-flung, marginal expression of these broader European dynamics. However, due to the profound isolation and distinct environmental conditions of Ireland, it is unlikely that these groups would have been able to replicate the full cultural repertoire seen elsewhere. The archaeological signature in Ireland is characterized by its sparseness and the apparent absence of many typical Late Upper Palaeolithic cultural markers, suggesting that any human presence was likely small-scale, ephemeral, and highly adapted to local, and challenging, conditions. The Irish material does not readily fit into the established cultural typologies of mainland Europe or even Britain, further emphasizing its unique, insular character.

VI. Unanswered Questions and Future Directions in Irish Palaeolithic Research

Despite recent advances, particularly the re-evaluation of material from Alice and Gwendoline Cave and Castlepook Cave, the Irish Palaeolithic remains shrouded in uncertainty. Numerous unanswered questions persist, and the field is ripe for future research employing innovative methodologies and interdisciplinary approaches.

A. Addressing the Gaps: Scarcity, Submergence, and Precision

A fundamental challenge is the sheer scarcity of evidence. Is this paucity a true reflection of minimal or extremely transient human presence, or is it largely a consequence of taphonomic loss due to glacial action, weathering, and unfavorable preservation conditions in many parts of Ireland?.2 Distinguishing between these possibilities is a primary goal.

A significant portion of the landscape potentially utilized by Palaeolithic groups is now submerged due to post-glacial sea-level rise.2 Coastlines and near-coastal environments, rich in resources, would have been attractive locations for early human activity. The inundation of these areas means that a substantial part of the Irish Palaeolithic record may lie beneath the waves, inaccessible through traditional terrestrial archaeological methods. Addressing this “submerged landscape” problem is critical for a more complete understanding, requiring the development and application of marine archaeological survey and investigation techniques, similar to those employed in areas like Doggerland.

Dating precision remains a critical issue. The Irish Palaeolithic narrative hinges on a few key dates from a very small number of sites. There is an ongoing need for reliable, high-precision dating of any newly discovered materials and, crucially, the systematic re-dating of faunal remains and other potential Palaeolithic artefacts from old collections using modern AMS radiocarbon dating and other advanced chronometric techniques.13 The history of Irish cave archaeology is replete with examples of disturbed deposits and the unreliability of dating by association 13, making direct dating of items with potential human modification essential.

Furthermore, there is a conspicuous lack of associated lithic industries securely linked to the earliest faunal evidence. While cut-marked bones suggest the use of stone tools, the tools themselves are largely missing from these Palaeolithic contexts, or their association is uncertain. Identifying and characterizing the stone tool technology, if any, used by these earliest visitors is a major research gap.

B. Promising Avenues: New Discoveries and Scientific Advances

Despite the challenges, several promising avenues exist for advancing our knowledge of the Irish Palaeolithic. Continued, targeted research at key sites like Castlepook Cave holds the potential for uncovering in-situ Palaeolithic occupation layers, complete with associated lithics, hearths, or more extensive faunal assemblages.15 The systematic re-examination of existing museum collections, a strategy that proved so fruitful with the Alice and Gwendoline bear patella 5, remains a high-priority, cost-effective approach. Many faunal assemblages from early cave excavations across Ireland have yet to be studied with modern analytical techniques.

The application of new scientific methods offers transformative potential. Ancient DNA (aDNA) analysis, successfully applied to sediments and faunal remains in other regions, could be used to detect human genetic traces even in the absence of skeletal remains, or to refine faunal chronologies and understand animal population dynamics.15 Isotopic analyses (e.g., strontium, oxygen, carbon, nitrogen) on any human or faunal remains can provide invaluable data on mobility patterns, diet, and palaeoclimatic conditions. Detailed sedimentary analyses, including micromorphology and lipid analysis (as undertaken at Alice and Gwendoline Cave 10), can reconstruct local environments and site formation processes with greater precision.

Targeted archaeological survey and excavation in areas identified as having high potential for Palaeolithic preservation – such as other limestone cave systems, or locations that may have been less affected by glacial scour or offer specific preservation conditions – could also yield new discoveries.

C. The Continuing Search: Methodological and Theoretical Considerations

Progress in Irish Palaeolithic research will increasingly depend on robust interdisciplinary collaboration, bringing together archaeologists, Quaternary geologists, palaeoecologists, geneticists, and dating specialists. Developing sophisticated predictive models for Palaeolithic site location, integrating palaeoenvironmental data, geomorphological information, and our understanding of hunter-gatherer landscape use, could help to focus survey efforts in this challenging terrain.

Theoretically, there is a need to refine frameworks for understanding pioneer colonizations in marginal, insular environments like Late Pleistocene Ireland. How did small groups adapt? What were the thresholds for successful colonization versus failed attempts? How did isolation shape their behaviour and material culture?

Finally, the importance of prompt and thorough publication of primary data, along with open engagement in scholarly debate through peer-reviewed journals such as Quaternary Science Reviews, the Journal of Irish Archaeology, and the Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy, is paramount for the advancement of the field.5 The academic debate surrounding the Irish Palaeolithic, for example, the discussions concerning the viability of Younger Dryas occupation or the interpretation of cut marks 10, is not a sign of weakness but rather a healthy and essential component of the scientific process. Such debates drive research forward by demanding higher standards of evidence, stimulating new research questions, and fostering more nuanced interpretations.

The future of Irish Palaeolithic research appears to lie significantly in the meticulous re-analysis of existing collections and the application of cutting-edge scientific methods to often scarce and fragmentary materials. While new, large-scale excavations will always hold allure, the transformative discoveries related to the Alice & Gwendoline patella and the re-dating of Castlepook material came from looking afresh at what was already known, or presumed known.¹ Given that many early excavations were conducted before modern recovery and documentation standards ¹³, and that the number of identified, promising Palaeolithic sites remains very small, investment in museum-based research, conservation, and the scientific analysis of existing assemblages is as crucial as prospecting for entirely new sites.

VII. Conclusion: Piecing Together the Deep Past – Fleeting Footprints in a Frozen Land

The story of Ireland’s Palaeolithic is one of tantalizing glimpses into a profoundly deep past, a narrative pieced together from scarce and often enigmatic evidence. The current state of knowledge suggests that human presence on the island during the Old Stone Age was, at best, sporadic and ephemeral – “fleeting footprints” left by pioneers on the edge of a frozen and dynamically changing world. Key evidence, primarily from Alice and Gwendoline Cave with its butchered bear patella dated to the Younger Dryas (c. 12,500 cal BP) ⁵, and Castlepook Cave with its potentially much earlier modified reindeer bone (c. 33,000 BP) and other Ice Age faunal remains ¹, points to brief incursions rather than sustained settlement. The isolated Mell flint, likely an ice-transported artefact, serves as a reminder of the complex geological processes that can mimic or obscure human traces.¹

The title of this exploration, “Before the Ice Melted,” encapsulates not just a chronological marker but the overarching environmental context of this early human story. The dramatic climatic shifts of the Late Pleistocene – the Midlandian Glaciation, the Bølling-Allerød warming, and the subsequent Younger Dryas cold snap – fundamentally shaped Ireland’s landscape, its faunal communities, and its very habitability.¹ Any human groups venturing into this environment faced extreme challenges: an insular setting with limited resources compared to continental landmasses, severe climatic instability, and profound isolation.⁶

The “fleeting footprints” are, therefore, significant not despite their ephemeral nature, but because of it. They represent the resilience and exploratory drive of Late Pleistocene humans, pushing into challenging and marginal environments. These early visitors, whether hunting parties or small exploratory groups, were pioneers navigating a landscape vastly different from the Ireland of today. Their faint traces are crucial for understanding the full temporal depth of human interaction with the island, providing a stark contrast to the more established Mesolithic communities that followed.

However, it must be acknowledged that these “fleeting footprints” are as much a testament to the limitations of archaeological preservation and discovery in Ireland as they are to the behaviour of Palaeolithic people. The scouring effects of glaciation, subsequent sea-level rise inundating former coastlines, and often acidic soil conditions in many areas have undoubtedly erased or deeply obscured much of the potential evidence.¹ The insular nature of Ireland also acted as a significant filter, limiting the opportunities for initial arrival and sustained contact.¹ Our current picture is, therefore, inevitably incomplete, a product of these powerful taphonomic and geographical filters. Humility in interpretation is essential; the perceived scarcity of evidence is an observation based on current data and is subject to change with new discoveries and analytical advancements.

The quest to understand Ireland’s Palaeolithic is an enduring one. The ongoing research at sites like Castlepook Cave, the potential for new discoveries through systematic survey and the re-examination of museum archives, and the application of advanced scientific techniques hold the promise of further illuminating this enigmatic period.⁵ Continued interdisciplinary investigation is paramount, as archaeologists, geologists, palaeoecologists, and other specialists work together to piece together the fragments of this deep past. Each new find, each refined date, adds another stroke to the emerging picture of life in Ireland before the ice finally melted, revealing the tenacity of early humans at the very edge of the Pleistocene world.

Works cited

1. Prehistoric Ireland – Wikipedia, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prehistoric_Ireland
2. The Palaeolithic – A Maritime Archaeological Research Agenda for England, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://researchframeworks.org/maritime/the-palaeolithic/
3. Human Existence in Ireland…Remarkable Discovery! – Far Horizons, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.farhorizons.com/human-existence-in-ireland-remarkable-discovery/
4. News – Ireland Inhabited 2,500 Years Earlier Than Previously …, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://archaeology.org/news/2016/03/21/160321-ireland-palaeolithic-bone/
5. Carved Palaeolithic bear bone proves human existence in Ireland – Archaeology Wiki, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.archaeology.wiki/blog/2016/03/23/carved-palaeolithic-bear-bone-proves-human-existence-ireland/
6. Hunter-Gatherers in Ireland – The Heritage Council, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.heritagecouncil.ie/content/files/Our-Ancient-Landscapes-Hunter-Gatherers-in-Ireland.pdf
7. During the Palaeolithic (Old Stone Age) period, much of Ireland was covered by ice sheets., accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.museum.ie/en-ie/collections-research/irish-antiquities-division-collections/collections-list-(1)/stone-age/prehistoric-details
8. Mesolithic Archaeology of Ireland: The First Hunter-Gatherer Settlements, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://irisharchaeology.org/mesolithic-archaeology-of-ireland-the-first-hunter-gatherer-settlements/
9. Who lived in Ireland before Neolithic times? – National Museums NI, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://cms.nationalmuseumsni.org/sites/default/files/2022-09/nmni-ancient-ireland-3-who-lived-in-ireland-before-neolithic-times_0.pdf
10. Alice and Gwendoline Cave – Wikipedia, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alice_and_Gwendoline_Cave
11. researchrepository.ucd.ie, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://researchrepository.ucd.ie/bitstreams/a68f63b9-a6f4-4aa4-b8a7-85dc6406da09/download
12. Climate change and prehistoric human populations: Eastward shift of settlement areas at the end of the last ice age | ScienceDaily, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2025/04/250403143947.htm
13. (PDF) The Irish Quaternary Fauna Project – ResearchGate, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/223448450_The_Irish_Quaternary_Fauna_Project
14. Plan of the Castlepook Cave system (after Scharff et al. 1918). A–F …, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Plan-of-the-Castlepook-Cave-system-after-Scharff-etal-1918-A-F-denote-named-areas_fig2_341803406
15. www.ria.ie, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.ria.ie/assets/uploads/2025/03/AREG-2024-Richard-Jennings.pdf
16. The Archaeology of Ireland: from the Mesolithic to the Modern Era, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://irisharchaeology.org/the-archaeology-of-ireland-from-the-mesolithic-to-the-modern-era/
17. Ruth F. Carden | University College Dublin | 28 Publications | 173 Citations | Related Authors – SciSpace, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://typeset.io/authors/ruth-f-carden-n5qqgukihc?papers_page=2
18. Revealing the Past 2023: In search of the elusive Palaeolithic in Ireland, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.ria.ie/video/revealing-the-past-2023-in-search-of-the-elusive-palaeolithic-in-ireland/
19. Archaeology Research Excavation Grant Report, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.ria.ie/assets/uploads/2024/10/AREG-2023-Richard-Jennings.pdf
20. Palaeolithic – South Yorkshire Historic Environment Research Framework, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://researchframeworks.org/syrf/palaeolithic/
21. Questioning the answers: re-solving fundamental problems of the Early Upper Palaeolithic., accessed on May 22, 2025, https://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/library/browse/issue.xhtml?recordId=1080186&recordType=MonographSeriesChapter
22. Palaeolithic – East Midlands Historic Environment Research Framework, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://researchframeworks.org/emherf/regional-overview/the-palaeolithic/
23. a critical evaluation of the lower-middle palaeolithic archaeological record of the chalk uplands of northwest europe – UCL Discovery, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/10095025/7/Blundell_10095025_Thesis_sig_removed.pdf
24. accessed on January 1, 1970, https.researchframeworks.org/maritime/the-palaeolithic/
25. Journal of Irish Archaeology – JIA – Institute of Archaeologists of Ireland, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.iai.ie/journal-of-irish-archaeology-jia/
26. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy: Archaeology, Culture, History, Literature, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://muse.jhu.edu/journal/813